The 5th amendment of the US constitution took that from you many years ago.

From: Trevor Bough 
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 10:30 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Live Link

As a property owner, I find that idea completely terrifying. I should 
absolutely have the right to say what is or is not on my property. Working in 
the utility industry, I still find that idea completely terrifying. Electric 
utilities typically require at least 30' of dedicated ROW. Gas and water 
utilities typically require at least 20' of dedicated ROW. Would you like to be 
required to give up 70' of your front yard without any say? You still get to 
mow it and maintain it, but if the utility feels the shrub you planted will 
interfere with them operating their line, they have the right to come destroy 
it. I would love to have dedicated easements everywhere, but that is the reason 
there is dedicated public ROW everywhere. Honestly people would be much better 
off dedicating 20' to a utility easement when they record the legal description 
of their property. Virtually all utilities can fit into a single 20' easement, 
especially if several go aerial, they just don't like to. In my opinion, 
eminent domain should be a difficult process with a requirement on the 
condemning authority to prove need and history of good faith negotiations. Just 
my 2 cents (probably closer to $0.10 now). 

On Feb 28, 2015 10:48 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:

  Tangent...


  I understand property rights and all, but I'd like to see automatic approval 
for all ROW requests by qualified entities.




  -----
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "Trevor Bough" <[email protected]>
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:56:45 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Live Link


  Apparently Missourians fight to protect their property rights more vigorously 
because, here anyway, it is a lengthy and expensive process. Landowners in MO 
can also be awarded legal fees if the condemning authority drops or loses the 
case of eminent domain, so it is definitely not a, "This guy is being 
difficult, we'll show him." fix-all. 
http://watchdog.org/88546/missouri-landowners-win-in-eminent-domain-test-case/ 
Looks like it wasn't always the case here though.

  On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

    I have done it several times.  In my cases it was pretty much the easy 
button.   Just had to wait for the docket.

    From: Trevor Bough 
    Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 6:21 PM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Live Link

    It's not quite that easy... You have to be authorized by the state to be 
able to use eminent domain and even then it is a very lengthy process (minimum 
of six months typically) and it has to be for "public use", which a utility can 
qualify as, but even after going to court for six months or more to prove that 
this is necessary for the public you are still at the mercy of the quart ruling 
that you are right and now have the luxury of paying the landowner for the 
access. It's not some magic automatic "Easy Button".

    On Feb 26, 2015 1:34 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:

      If you need to cross property with your pole line or underground line, 
you can do so under the right of eminent domain.  Landowner has no say so.  You 
go to court, the judge bangs the gavel, and voila, instant ROW.  However at 
that point in time the tables turn somewhat in the favor of the landowner as 
you have to compensate them for what you have taken.

      That that typically ends up at a place where it became a very expensive 
ROW...

      What you are talking about below is the establishment of a prescriptive 
ROW through your failure to defend your property.  Another word for it is 
acquiescence or adverse possession.  You can certainly lose your right to 
defend if you sit on your rights.  So, yea, if they didn't have an easement or 
court order, cut down that pole.

      -----Original Message----- From: Adam Moffett
      Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 12:27 PM
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Live Link

      What eminent domain actions can a utility take?  My "knowledge" on that
      topic is all hearsay.

      I heard of a landowner who saw a company putting a pole in an empty lot
      that he owned across the street from his house.  He watched them set the
      pole and then after the workers left he went out with a chainsaw and cut
      it down because they never asked him if they could put the pole there
      (so the story went).  In his point of view, if he let them put the pole
      there, they have permanent rights to access that spot on his property
      because of eminent domain.


        You may even have the right of eminent domain now.




Reply via email to