Im not scared of CMS in fact its been really easy for web deployment or
major updates.
What would scare me is if it were sitting on a windows server.
The virus that was seen is not anywhere on my server but sitting on his
system which is triggered when
visting sites with java or flash that may be out of date.
I have since updated the java but not the flash because we dont use it
anymore.
Never a fan of an antivirus developed outside of US.
On 3/3/2015 11:26 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I refuse to use any CMS system of any kind because they're easily
exploited.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"David" <dmilho...@wletc.com>
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Tuesday, March 3, 2015 11:17:27 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..
Interesting,
We use drupal for this site so its possible not sure how it happened
because its sits on a Lamp stack server.
Thanks
Dave
On 03/03/2015 10:46 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
FYI David
Inline image 1
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David <dmilho...@wletc.com
<mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com>> wrote:
Yes,
I love my 3.65 deployment thus far and not looking back.
Steadily moving with more tower growth and more deployments.
We have 4 sites scheduled this year to go on and 1 is
completed working 2 this next quarter.
We are doing a full 3.65 on each site and adding 5Ghz 450
where it makes sense.
On 03/03/2015 09:23 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
We love 5.15-5.25 though. So far our customer testing is
showing performance very close to our 3.65 due to the low
noise floor, and I know you've been reading about how the
3.65 is doing.
Patrick
Telrad
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:03 AM, David
<dmilho...@wletc.com <mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com>> wrote:
Agreed but now there could be less room for additional
development of other wireless devices.
Also, if they would stay on on side of the band would
be nice like 5.1
Still plenty of room for us.
On 03/03/2015 06:31 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
That's called "malicious interference" and can and
should get you fined and shut down. Further, it is
not WISP spectrum and never was. I have never
understood the WISP sense of entitlement with
unlicensed (free) spectrum, especially given that
it is a population that is largely politically
conservative.
On Mar 2, 2015 12:16 PM, "Tim Reichhart"
<t...@nwohiobb.com <mailto:t...@nwohiobb.com>> wrote:
That means can we point our 5ghz backhaul
stuff at there towers and make there signal
about worthless? If so that would teach cell
phone companies not to mess with WISP’s spectrum.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of
*Peter Kranz
*Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 12:03 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the
commons on 5 GHz..
If systems like this end up rolling out on
cell sites across the nation we are going to
see some tough times getting clear channels.
I’ve seen several proposals now for tower
based systems that use very large swaths of
5Ghz as alternative LTE data paths to cell
phones with multi-channel BW designed to suck
up every free piece of 5Ghz spectrum found.
http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/02/t-mobile-alcatel-wifi-and-4g-fight/
*Peter Kranz
*Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <tel:510-868-1614%20x100>
Mobile: 510-207-0000 <tel:510-207-0000>
pkr...@unwiredltd.com
<mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com>
--
Patrick Leary
Director BD, North America, Telrad
727.501.3735 <tel:727.501.3735>
patrickleary.af...@gmail.com
<mailto:patrickleary.af...@gmail.com> [this address is
only for AFMUG]
patrick.le...@telrad.com
<mailto:patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this is my corporate
address]
--
Patrick Leary
Director BD, North America, Telrad
727.501.3735
patrickleary.af...@gmail.com <mailto:patrickleary.af...@gmail.com>
[this address is only for AFMUG]
patrick.le...@telrad.com <mailto:patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this
is my corporate address]
--
