That's what I needed to know.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Patrick Leary 
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:16 PM
  Subject: [AFMUG] About $12k


  One BTS, included embedded EPC with MAC level authentication (cheapest 
option) supporting up to 50 clients. Antenna could be swapped for any other. 
NOTE: this exclude any NMS pieces, but you could just connect over Telnet or 
direct connect. This would be the BAREST of bones, but there it is. That's 
still LTE and about 100 Mbps with killer NLOS.

   

  Includes:

   

        735270
       CMP.XT-BS-3.4-3.7
       1
       
        715773
       LTE COMPACT SW License
       1
       
        700258
       BMAX-4M-GPS 
       1
       
        300736
       ANT 3.3-3.8GHz,18 dBi, 65deg, 4ports 
        (RF cables NOT included)
       1
       
        715620
       BreezeWay-1010-50
        (per Compact HW license)
       1
       
        715621
       BreezeWay-1010-iHSS-50
        (50 subs. license)
       1
       
        SLA
       1 Year SLA
       1
       

   

   

        Patrick Leary

        M 727.501.3735 


       
             
       

   

   

  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary
  Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:08 PM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback

   

  No, could be much less. Give me a minute...

   

        Patrick Leary

        M 727.501.3735 


       
             
       

   

   

  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
  Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:05 PM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback

   

  Probably 20k to start. Quality over quantity.

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

  On Mar 3, 2015 8:56 PM, "John Woodfield" <john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz> wrote:

  Patrick,

   

  I haven't had time to read through all this emails. Can you summarize what 
the lowest cost get up and running on a tower is so I can consider this further 
along with cost per sub?

   

   

  Thanks,

   

   

   

  John Woodfield, President

  Delmarva WiFi Inc.

  410-870-WiFi



  -----Original Message-----
  From: "Patrick Leary" <patrick.le...@telrad.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 8:41pm
  To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback

  Alvarion did that. I admit, I'm not a fan of capping Glen. It is a gimmick. 
The hardware is what it is, and this hardware is expensive. 30dBm per port. 4 
tx/4rx. Power is expensive. The highest quality DSPs on the market. not 
consumer grade stuff with the sensitivity of your in home Wi-Fi router. We 
build our own phy from the ground up too, our own ATPC algorithms too. 

   

  On the software, we do that though -- enabling modularity and scale as you 
need to. I think I need to do a dedicated webinar to this community to walk you 
guys (or those inclined) through it (any takers?). I do not think we can be a 
solution that makes sense where you only have 15 clients. That's the blunt 
truth. Unless you are doing 50 Mbps customers, I am not your micropop (but I 
can do that in some modest scale). That said, I wonder where that 15 number 
comes from? Can you please explain on what architecture that is based? Range? 
Height? Etc. If it is based on a micropop and even then on what just that pop 
can see, I'd say that's likely a model invented out of necessity due to the 
poor performance of the system you are using.

   

  I had a guy on a call today. He zoomed me in on Google Earth to his "NLOS" 
area. Farmland with wind breaks and shade trees for the homes. He is at 400' 
and can't connect squat behind those breaks. In my world, that's LOS all the 
way, even at 150 ft. It is total garbage that so many systems to can't deal 
with that and you've all been fed that that is "normal." It is not. It is just 
gear with terrible specs where the only R&D is at the software level, and even 
that is scant. ....You do not have NLOS problems. You have equipment problems. 
How such a product ever was allowed to go to market as a "solution" for rural 
broadband is, to me, cynical and reflective of playing a market to skim 
opportunistic dollars from a market segment that sometimes seems to embrace 
abuse. Sort of like the poor 700 MHz owners who got sucked in to buying 20 year 
old Marconi WipLL repackaged as a 700 MHz "solution" because all there was to 
buy. Then vendors do that crap and THEN, THEN tell you there's no backward 
compatibility when they come out with something new? 

   

  WISPs. Sometimes you guys drive me nuts. You are like cheerleaders that love 
to date the quarterbacks who abuse you. That is like selling a car that falls 
apart once you leave residential streets. None of you should ever have accepted 
these golf carts to run your fleets. Sometimes, cheap is just cheap.

   

  Boy, I'm gonna hear it from my vendor peers, but this ain't a game or just a 
job for me. I damn sure hope it ain't that for you either.

   

        Patrick Leary

        M 727.501.3735


       
               
             
       

   

   

  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop
  Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:08 PM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback

   

  Sort of off topic, but what would be the smallest AP we could get?

  I'm thinking about using this system on a few of my towers to make sure we 
never leave without a new customer, but I serve a very rural area.

  I have some towers with 15 clients.

  Is an omni + GPS sync or narrow channel out of the question?

   

   

   

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Patrick Leary 

    To: tel...@wispa.org ; af@afmug.com 

    Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:42 PM

    Subject: [AFMUG] New feedback

     

    This is an interesting bit of commentary from one of our new customers. If 
he wishes to identify himself, he will....

     

          Patrick Leary

          M 727.501.3735


         
                 
               
         

     

     

    From:

    Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:31 AM
    To: Patrick Leary; Nick Dewar
    Subject: Interesting Statistic

     

    "Patrick / Nick –

     

    Our Director of Operations, which you both met in St Louis, sent out an 
interesting email to our staff this evening. In February with only 20 working 
days we completed 40 installs with one technician... This is only icing on the 
cake, especially since we are onboarding two more techs... I ran some 
additional numbers and found that out of the “Telrad” installations that we 
scheduled, 100 % were successful both of these months. This is a game changer, 
and it proves that we can eliminate the need to waste further time with the 
dreaded site surveys.  Our success is not without the help of Telrad’s Compact 
solution.  Truly amazing and inspiring, excited for our aggressive expansion 
this spring/summer/fall.  I cannot wait to have hundreds of these damn things 
in the air.  

     

    Excited and thankful to be a part of the LTE Beta, and am thankful for the 
“Holy Grail” email that introduced us to the product...."

     





    
************************************************************************************
    This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
    PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
    
************************************************************************************





  
************************************************************************************
  This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
  PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
  
************************************************************************************





  
************************************************************************************
  This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
  PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
  
************************************************************************************




  
************************************************************************************
  This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
  PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
  
************************************************************************************





  
************************************************************************************
  This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
  PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
  
************************************************************************************





  
************************************************************************************
  This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
  PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
  
************************************************************************************





  
************************************************************************************
  This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
  PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
  
************************************************************************************

Reply via email to