Ouch.  I haven't ruled out trying it myself either :)

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

> The people here don't get out much.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 3, 2015 10:25:50 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
>
> "If" being the operative term. Until I personally test it, or I hear from
> other regulars on this list that are using it, it's pie in the sky to me.
> I'm not closed off to the idea, just skeptical for obvious reasons.
>
> On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>
>> Patrick's not here to make friends.
>>
>> He does have a point, though. If a product is revolutionary, you can't
>> look at it the same way everything else.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Glen Waldrop" <gwl...@cngwireless.net>
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:19:22 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
>>
>> The 15 number comes from rural area. I have some towers that can only hit
>> a few homes. Of those few, some still have OTA TV and rotary phones. They
>> have no need nor want for Internet. Don't get hung up on that.
>>
>> I'm looking at probably 4 of these strategically placed in my network to
>> cover any blind spots I might have over my coverage area.
>>
>> I'm not following, "capping"?
>>
>> Aside from that, this email came off more than a bit condesending.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Patrick Leary
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:41 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
>>
>>  Alvarion did that. I admit, I'm not a fan of capping Glen. It is a
>> gimmick. The hardware is what it is, and this hardware is expensive. 30dBm
>> per port. 4 tx/4rx. Power is expensive. The highest quality DSPs on the
>> market. not consumer grade stuff with the sensitivity of your in home Wi-Fi
>> router. We build our own phy from the ground up too, our own ATPC
>> algorithms too.
>>
>>
>>
>> On the software, we do that though -- enabling modularity and scale as
>> you need to. I think I need to do a dedicated webinar to this community to
>> walk you guys (or those inclined) through it (any takers?). I do not think
>> we can be a solution that makes sense where you only have 15 clients.
>> That's the blunt truth. Unless you are doing 50 Mbps customers, I am not
>> your micropop (but I can do that in some modest scale). That said, I wonder
>> where that 15 number comes from? Can you please explain on what
>> architecture that is based? Range? Height? Etc. If it is based on a
>> micropop and even then on what just that pop can see, I'd say that's likely
>> a model invented out of necessity due to the poor performance of the system
>> you are using.
>>
>>
>>
>> I had a guy on a call today. He zoomed me in on Google Earth to his
>> "NLOS" area. Farmland with wind breaks and shade trees for the homes. He is
>> at 400' and can't connect squat behind those breaks. In my world, that's
>> LOS all the way, even at 150 ft. It is total garbage that so many systems
>> to can't deal with that and you've all been fed that that is "normal." It
>> is not. It is just gear with terrible specs where the only R&D is at the
>> software level, and even that is scant. ....You do not have NLOS problems.
>> You have equipment problems. How such a product ever was allowed to go to
>> market as a "solution" for rural broadband is, to me, cynical and
>> reflective of playing a market to skim opportunistic dollars from a market
>> segment that sometimes seems to embrace abuse. Sort of like the poor 700
>> MHz owners who got sucked in to buying 20 year old Marconi WipLL repackaged
>> as a 700 MHz "solution" because all there was to buy. Then vendors do that
>> crap and THEN, THEN tell you there's no backward compatibility when they
>> come out with something new?
>>
>>
>>
>> WISPs. Sometimes you guys drive me nuts. You are like cheerleaders that
>> love to date the quarterbacks who abuse you. That is like selling a car
>> that falls apart once you leave residential streets. None of you should
>> ever have accepted these golf carts to run your fleets. Sometimes, cheap is
>> just cheap.
>>
>>
>>
>> Boy, I'm gonna hear it from my vendor peers, but this ain't a game or
>> just a job for me. I damn sure hope it ain't that for you either.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Patrick Leary*
>>
>> *M* 727.501.3735
>>
>> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Glen Waldrop
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:08 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
>>
>>
>>
>> Sort of off topic, but what would be the smallest AP we could get?
>>
>> I'm thinking about using this system on a few of my towers to make sure
>> we never leave without a new customer, but I serve a very rural area.
>>
>> I have some towers with 15 clients.
>>
>> Is an omni + GPS sync or narrow channel out of the question?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> *From:* Patrick Leary
>>
>> *To:* tel...@wispa.org ; af@afmug.com
>>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:42 PM
>>
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] New feedback
>>
>>
>>
>> This is an interesting bit of commentary from one of our new customers.
>> If he wishes to identify himself, he will....
>>
>>
>>
>> *Patrick Leary*
>>
>> *M* 727.501.3735
>>
>> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*
>>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:31 AM
>> *To:* Patrick Leary; Nick Dewar
>> *Subject:* Interesting Statistic
>>
>>
>>
>> "Patrick / Nick –
>>
>>
>>
>> Our Director of Operations, which you both met in St Louis, sent out an
>> interesting email to our staff this evening. In February with only 20
>> working days we completed 40 installs with one technician... This is
>> only icing on the cake, especially since we are onboarding two more techs.
>> .. I ran some additional numbers and found that out of the “Telrad”
>> installations that we scheduled, 100 % were successful both of these
>> months. This is a game changer, and it proves that we can eliminate the
>> need to waste further time with the dreaded site surveys.  Our success is
>> not without the help of Telrad’s Compact solution.  Truly amazing and
>> inspiring, excited for our aggressive expansion this spring/summer/fall.  I
>> cannot wait to have hundreds of these damn things in the air.
>>
>>
>>
>> Excited and thankful to be a part of the LTE Beta, and am thankful for
>> the “Holy Grail” email that introduced us to the product...."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>> computer viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>> computer viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>> computer viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to