We wanted to do a test but stopped due to pricing. It is Alvarion-Style. Every 
mount, cable, ... seems to be golden. Every goodie is an upgrade option.
And as with other gear. 3 years from now it is old stuff. 
Our ROI is better doing smaller cells and use cheaper gear.
Towers will stay beyond 3 years. Everything I mount ...

Nevertheless a shootout between PMP 450 and Compact would be great to see. We 
have seen so much and intense marketing in the past. Even Patrick can't cry 
loud enough...

So gimme a real live comparison including pricing between two 4 sector towers 
to make me a believer.

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: af-requ...@afmug.com 
Datum: 04.03.2015  06:22  (GMT+01:00) 
An: af@afmug.com 
Betreff: Af Digest, Vol 7, Issue 160 

Send Af mailing list submissions to
af@afmug.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
af-requ...@afmug.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
af-ow...@afmug.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Af digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: New feedback (Glen Waldrop)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 23:20:21 -0600
From: "Glen Waldrop" <gwl...@cngwireless.net>
To: <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
Message-ID: <559A42CC5A9145A39DFBEAFC8EED95CF@ziggy7>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Close, south of Tuscaloosa, west of Montgomery. Same basic geography though, 
hills, cows, fish and trees.

Might be a redneck spread out amongst the trees.

Might be one of them...


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: CBB - Jay Fuller 
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:19 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback



  He's (glen)  between ttown and Montgomery patrick

  Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone


  ----- Reply message -----
  From: "Glen Waldrop" <gwl...@cngwireless.net>
  To: <af@afmug.com>
  Subject: [AFMUG] New feedback
  Date: Tue, Mar 3, 2015 11:10 PM




  Tree density is seriously mixed.

  Some places it is ridiculous, 100+ year growth, old forests. Nearly half of 
my coverage area is over farmland (beef, catfish) so those places are usually 
an easy shot.

  The truly irritating thing about wireless in this area is cedar trees. There 
won't be one tree in the yard, but there will almost always be a line of cedar 
across the road or something, somewhere near a fence line. Anyone that has the 
phobia that RF is killing us just needs to plant cedar.

  I've got a few places that if your system could serve you'd get a shining 
recommendation from me. Nothing short of going over cedar seems to work. 900MHz 
seems to get a half mile or less if cedar is involved. I can get over a mile 
away with the test AP on the ground and a yagi in my truck through hardwood and 
pine, but cedar just stops it cold.

  Mike Hammet may have a point though. I may not be your target audience. I 
might not get a return on my investment, but it would be irresponsible of me to 
not evaluate another tool to find out.


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Patrick Leary 
    To: af@afmug.com 
    Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:48 PM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback


    I suspect you could pull off omnis then. How's the tree density?

     

          Patrick Leary

          M 727.501.3735 


         
               
         

     

     

    From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop
    Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:19 PM
    To: af@afmug.com
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback

     

    The 15 number comes from rural area. I have some towers that can only hit a 
few homes. Of those few, some still have OTA TV and rotary phones. They have no 
need nor want for Internet. Don't get hung up on that.

     

    I'm looking at probably 4 of these strategically placed in my network to 
cover any blind spots I might have over my coverage area.


    I'm not following, "capping"?

    Aside from that, this email came off more than a bit condesending.

     

     

      ----- Original Message ----- 

      From: Patrick Leary 

      To: af@afmug.com 

      Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:41 PM

      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback

       

      Alvarion did that. I admit, I'm not a fan of capping Glen. It is a 
gimmick. The hardware is what it is, and this hardware is expensive. 30dBm per 
port. 4 tx/4rx. Power is expensive. The highest quality DSPs on the market. not 
consumer grade stuff with the sensitivity of your in home Wi-Fi router. We 
build our own phy from the ground up too, our own ATPC algorithms too. 

       

      On the software, we do that though -- enabling modularity and scale as 
you need to. I think I need to do a dedicated webinar to this community to walk 
you guys (or those inclined) through it (any takers?). I do not think we can be 
a solution that makes sense where you only have 15 clients. That's the blunt 
truth. Unless you are doing 50 Mbps customers, I am not your micropop (but I 
can do that in some modest scale). That said, I wonder where that 15 number 
comes from? Can you please explain on what architecture that is based? Range? 
Height? Etc. If it is based on a micropop and even then on what just that pop 
can see, I'd say that's likely a model invented out of necessity due to the 
poor performance of the system you are using.

       

      I had a guy on a call today. He zoomed me in on Google Earth to his 
"NLOS" area. Farmland with wind breaks and shade trees for the homes. He is at 
400' and can't connect squat behind those breaks. In my world, that's LOS all 
the way, even at 150 ft. It is total garbage that so many systems to can't deal 
with that and you've all been fed that that is "normal." It is not. It is just 
gear with terrible specs where the only R&D is at the software level, and even 
that is scant. ....You do not have NLOS problems. You have equipment problems. 
How such a product ever was allowed to go to market as a "solution" for rural 
broadband is, to me, cynical and reflective of playing a market to skim 
opportunistic dollars from a market segment that sometimes seems to embrace 
abuse. Sort of like the poor 700 MHz owners who got sucked in to buying 20 year 
old Marconi WipLL repackaged as a 700 MHz "solution" because all there was to 
buy. Then vendors do that crap and THEN, THEN tell you the
re's no backward compatibility when they come out with something new? 

       

      WISPs. Sometimes you guys drive me nuts. You are like cheerleaders that 
love to date the quarterbacks who abuse you. That is like selling a car that 
falls apart once you leave residential streets. None of you should ever have 
accepted these golf carts to run your fleets. Sometimes, cheap is just cheap.

       

      Boy, I'm gonna hear it from my vendor peers, but this ain't a game or 
just a job for me. I damn sure hope it ain't that for you either.

       

            Patrick Leary

            M 727.501.3735 


           
                 
           

       

       

      From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop
      Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:08 PM
      To: af@afmug.com
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback

       

      Sort of off topic, but what would be the smallest AP we could get?

      I'm thinking about using this system on a few of my towers to make sure 
we never leave without a new customer, but I serve a very rural area.

      I have some towers with 15 clients.

      Is an omni + GPS sync or narrow channel out of the question?

       

       

       

        ----- Original Message ----- 

        From: Patrick Leary 

        To: tel...@wispa.org ; af@afmug.com 

        Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:42 PM

        Subject: [AFMUG] New feedback

         

        This is an interesting bit of commentary from one of our new customers. 
If he wishes to identify himself, he will....

         

              Patrick Leary

              M 727.501.3735 


             
                   
             

         

         

        From: 

        Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:31 AM
        To: Patrick Leary; Nick Dewar
        Subject: Interesting Statistic

         

        "Patrick / Nick ?

         

        Our Director of Operations, which you both met in St Louis, sent out an 
interesting email to our staff this evening. In February with only 20 working 
days we completed 40 installs with one technician... This is only icing on the 
cake, especially since we are onboarding two more techs... I ran some 
additional numbers and found that out of the ?Telrad? installations that we 
scheduled, 100 % were successful both of these months. This is a game changer, 
and it proves that we can eliminate the need to waste further time with the 
dreaded site surveys.  Our success is not without the help of Telrad?s Compact 
solution.  Truly amazing and inspiring, excited for our aggressive expansion 
this spring/summer/fall.  I cannot wait to have hundreds of these damn things 
in the air.  

         

        Excited and thankful to be a part of the LTE Beta, and am thankful for 
the ?Holy Grail? email that introduced us to the product...."

         





        
************************************************************************************
        This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
        PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & 
computer viruses.
        
************************************************************************************





      
************************************************************************************
      This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
      PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & 
computer viruses.
      
************************************************************************************





      
************************************************************************************
      This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
      PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & 
computer viruses.
      
************************************************************************************





    
************************************************************************************
    This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
    PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
    
************************************************************************************





    
************************************************************************************
    This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
    PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
    
************************************************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://afmug.com/pipermail/af/attachments/20150303/f33e4d9b/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Af mailing list
Af@afmug.com
http://afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af


------------------------------

End of Af Digest, Vol 7, Issue 160
**********************************

Reply via email to