Not OSHA approved.  I have a few spare ones you can borrow for a Compact.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com>
wrote:

>  I think I need to get my old hard hat out of the garage
>
>  *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID*
>  On Mar 4, 2015 2:27 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>  You are the subject, sir.  Just not of this thread.
>
>
>  Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  Damn, how did my name get in the subject?
>>
>>  *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID*
>>  On Mar 4, 2015 2:17 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> wrote:
>>   Ubiquiti claimed carrier grade, too.
>>
>>
>>  Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>  On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Jon Auer <j...@tapodi.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Purewave claiming SDR because they can add proprietary extensions seems
>>> like Ubiquiti claiming to be SDR because they licensed Atheros driver code
>>> so they could make AirMax.
>>>
>>>  I always thought SDR meant the signal processing, anything to do with
>>> making sense of the RF, happened in software (FPGA counts!). Ettus
>>> Research's USRP is a example on TX/RX. RTL-SDR USB sticks on the RX only.
>>> E.g. If, in theory, the manufacturer can reprogram it to be a FM radio
>>> (maybe you replace the transciever/amps first though).
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why is it not software defined?  Because DAN owned the core WIMAX
>>>> software? Purewave claimed to have purchased the rights to make their own
>>>> mods, that was one of their claimed advantages over PMP320.  Not sure what
>>>> Mercury would say now.  But don't they have a proprietary enhanced (but not
>>>> LTE) version now?  I don't see how they do that if it's not a SDR.
>>>>
>>>> I assume we are talking about the part of Purewave that went to
>>>> Mercury, not the part that went to Redline.
>>>>
>>>> If you mean was it designed to do both WIMAX and LTE with just a
>>>> different software load, no, they never claimed that AFAIK.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Englhardt
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:30 PM
>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback (Patrick Leary)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  PW is not SDR based
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So call their Distributors and tell them to change their announcements.
>>>> Just google Purwave and SDR and you find some.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>> computer viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>> computer viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>

Reply via email to