curious if its bad form to have a caching DNS server be a slave to our authoritative Nameservers as a backup, just having an ACL limited to our network
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > I'll have to look into anycast some day. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"can...@believewireless.net" <p...@believewireless.net> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:16:58 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] poll: do you do your own DNS entirely in house? > > In-house, anycast, multiple locations. > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >> Everything is in-house on various VMs. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *e...@kuhnke-international.com >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Wednesday, March 4, 2015 12:16:24 PM >> *Subject: *[AFMUG] poll: do you do your own DNS entirely in house? >> >> >> Ex: >> >> Authoritative ns1 and ns2 for your domains, ns3 authoritative in a >> different geographical location? >> >> Recursive/caching for clients? >> >> Control all your own MX and SPF records? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
