3 or 6db if your trying to mitigate a HPOL or VPOL interferer On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Jerry Richardson <je...@richardson.bz> wrote:
> Isn’t there a S/N improvement? > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout > *Sent:* Saturday, March 07, 2015 9:51 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Typical improvement when using 45* slant > > > > slant just confuses multipath/reflections a little. Signal doesn't change. > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > Uh if both sides are slant wouldn't it be the same? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mar 7, 2015 12:34 PM, "Jerry Richardson" <je...@richardson.bz> wrote: > > Looking at using AF5X for a link with the 34dB 45* slants > > > > What kind of improvement would you expect to see over standard V/H > polarization? +3dB? +6dB? > > > > Thanks! > > >
