Yes and no. Need to get one
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 8, 2015 11:34 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At 4 miles, the other end should be visible. Right?
>
> Ever use the WB opti-align?
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 3/8/2015 9:49 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>
> All outdoor. On water tank rails. On masts. I am not sure if they were
> installed on catwalks before and now on top. I am going to ask about
> that. Both antennas are about 168 ft AGL...you got me thinking. ..
>
> Jaime Solorza
> On Mar 8, 2015 10:33 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 18 is not that different from 11 or 23 for that matter. It should behave
>> similarly, except for the beamwidth with a given antenna size and the
>> freespace loss.
>>
>> Are these split mount or all-outdoor? Is it the same at both ends? Is
>> the path clear? Any fresnel issues?
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 3/8/2015 9:22 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Targeted RSL is -42 at 4.08 miles
>>> Tx power at 14db. Should be 14.5dB ....three different companies have
>>> aligned these dishes before I was asked to try and get the link closer to
>>> targeted figure. On this one -53.1 is best I got. A bit better than others
>>> but not where they want. I took both antennas completed off paths and
>>> started over. Got it to above level. Made sure it was not sidelobe.
>>> These radios are about 6 years old Dragonwave...the client says they were
>>> in mid 40s according to records. What can cause such a difference if
>>> alignment is not an issue?
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>
>>>
>>
>
