Definitely not. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 9, 2015 11:23 AM, "Jeremy" <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> WDS definitely does not halve the bandwidth of the clients. > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Vince West <vi...@shelbybb.com> wrote: > >> Doing the separate links would be the best option. You have a little more >> control over the quality of each link as opposed to one link possibly >> bringing down the whole AP. >> >> I am not really sure WDS is going to help you much. WDS mostly provides >> L2 access, if you CPE is a bridged CPE. I am not sure you will see much >> benefit from WDS. I thought, and I could be wrong, that WDSing all the >> clients on one AP halves the bandwidth of the clients. I could be wrong. >> >> Vince West >> Tower Hand >> Technical Support >> Shelby Broadband >> 148 Citizens Blvd >> Simpsonville, KY 40067 >> Phone: 1-888-364-4232 >> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Jerry Richardson <je...@richardson.bz> >> wrote: >> >>> What is the distance and angle from the stations to the AP? Also, the >>> pattern on the antenna is pretty wide, LOS is pretty important. If they are >>> too low on the roofline they will not perform well >>> >>> Yes WDS makes a difference but not that much. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett >>> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 7:21 AM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: [AFMUG] UBNT Station to Station performance >>> >>> I'm looking at a site where somebody has installed three UBNT M5 >>> stations pointing at a UBNT M5 AP. Performance station to station is >>> important for this customer, and it kind of sucks. >>> >>> I'm suggesting that we replace the whole thing with three separate point >>> to point links, but in the short term will I get better performance from >>> site to site if I change the stations into WDS APs? My feeling is >>> "probably", but I wonder if someone who's already done this can tell me. >>> >>> >> >
