> That's flexible mode though... I'm assuming latency is going to be the same > is it is with PtMP Synced mode, which I think is supposed to be about 17ms. > But I'm assuming that's going to be reduced quite a lot when the 2.5ms frame > size is available.
What is frame size now? > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: >> >> The newer PTP mode is ~2ms. Older is ~8ms I think? >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Any guess on latency when in this mode? >>> >>> >>> On Monday, March 16, 2015, John Butler <john.but...@cambiumnetworks.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The plan is that there will be a software upgrade that will allow you to >>>> enable GPS Sync mode of operation, but only in the PTP configuration – >>>> that >>>> is one “SM” connected. You will not need to purchase a license key to >>>> enable that. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber >>>> Broadcasting) >>>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:32 PM >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110 PTP >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dude, for real, more licensing? >>>> >>>> On 3/16/2015 1:02 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> >>>> Software license? Auuuuuuuuuuugh. What happened to Cambium 2.0? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi >>>> <sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> No, that’s not what I said. The Force 110 PTP is sold today with sync >>>> capabilities disabled. There is a plan to allow enabling of sync through a >>>> software license. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Software Tick™. Got it. Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman >>>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 12:54 PM >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110 PTP >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Are you saying that the units will never do PTP sync? I understand that >>>> you don't want them used for PTMP sync, but I don't see why you'd hinder >>>> your product and our services by never enabling PTP sync. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Software tick" is trademarked, you can use it if you enable PTP sync =) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi >>>> <sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Correct. The video shows the Force 110 which uses the Unsync’d radio >>>> (identified by the two Ethernet ports). The Force 110 PTP comes with the >>>> Connectorized radio with Sync (single GigE port and GPS >>>> chip/connectors/antenna all included) but with a software tick (Thanks >>>> Josh. >>>> I’m using this going forward J) to disable sync functionality. The radio >>>> will still track satellites and provide coordinates but will not allow >>>> sync. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Sriram >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard >>>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 12:42 PM >>>> To: af >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110 PTP >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That's just a standard Force 110 in that video - not a PTP, the PTP is >>>> the exact same hardware as the synced AP and does have a GPS port (it even >>>> comes with the GPS antenna), but has it currently has sync disabled in >>>> software, but Cambium has stated that they are planning to enable sync for >>>> point-to-point. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > It's expected, yes. >>>> >>>> Do they have a GPS antenna port? Not seeing one. >>>> >>>> ePMP Force 110 - Montagem >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >> Will these eventually have GPS sync with a firmware update for >>>> >> frequency >>>> >> reuse? >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >
