I did not dispute that part Adam. In case you did not notice, I was pretty 
specific about that which I did dispute.

Patrick Leary
 M 727.501.3735 






-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 4:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP320 vs. PMP450

Of course, you can come on down and prove me wrong if you want to. If you do 
I'll deliver a hand written apology for my doubting.

On 3/17/2015 4:15 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
> No, I agree with Mark.  "It would work in some places that seemed 
> impossible and not work in others that absolutely should have been fine"
> Except I would expand the statement to all NLOS products, ever.
>
> It's factual because it matches observed facts.  That's the definition 
> of factual.
>
> On 3/17/2015 3:33 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
>> I just don't think your answer is factual Mark, unless you were 
>> exclusively addressing it within the context of 320 and 450, but you 
>> went broader and beyond. I'd have said nothing if you had left it 
>> between those two products.
>>
>> Patrick Leary
>>   M 727.501.3735
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:13 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP320 vs. PMP450
>>
>> Eric asked about 320 vs 450, and I answered his question.
>>
>> Not every question is a marketing opportunity for Telrad.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On 3/17/15 3:00 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
>>> This, respectfully, is a view centered on limited experience. 
>>> Discussing range in exclusion of product and only as a function of 
>>> frequency, is, well, wrong. Lots of other things come in to play, 
>>> from power to specs. The 320 beats the 450 in NLOS for reasons 
>>> explained by basic math, better power and sensitivity, for example.
>>> For the same reason, we beat both.
>>>
>>> Second, re "WiMAX" being inconsistent, I'll bet you've never used 
>>> real WiMAX Mark. the 320 and Purewave were BOTH proprietary spins on 
>>> WiMAX. They were no more WiMAX than UBNT is straight Wi-Fi. There 
>>> were many BreezeMAX WiMAX users who experienced rock solid consistency.
>>>
>>> Patrick Leary
>>>    M 727.501.3735
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Mark Radabaugh
>> Amplex
>>
>> [email protected]  419.837.5015 x 1021
>>
>>
>> *********************************************************************
>> *************** This footnote confirms that this email message has 
>> been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious 
>> code, vandals & computer viruses.
>> *********************************************************************
>> ***************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *********************************************************************
>> *************** This footnote confirms that this email message has 
>> been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious 
>> code, vandals & computer viruses.
>> *********************************************************************
>> ***************
>>
>>
>


 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************




 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************

Reply via email to