af won't do multipoint, right?
:)
----- Original Message -----
From: Mathew Howard
To: af
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link?
Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all the
way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:
I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it needs done
in the next couple weeks.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units.
The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have airprism. The
PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently differences in airprism
between the two which means they will always be limited to ptp or ptmp, as far
as I know this is going to be a permanent separation.
The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are going
to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy features like
live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this point is the lack of
DFS and UNII-1.
I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this point
unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should perform best of
the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at this point. I expect
AF5x to be better than any of them in every way.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:
The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only
connectorized units?
What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only?
Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already
have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP parabolics. I
figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats what now,
is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this two things
that are going to converge?
Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is there
any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of performance?
(future demand is a factor as well)
Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three
products there?
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
