yet reminds me of what they said last week was the most litigated term in the
english language...."reasonable".... lol
----- Original Message -----
From: Josh Reynolds
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
Can't do multipoint "yet". Yet is the key word :)
On March 21, 2015 7:18:33 AM AKDT, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
RIght, airfiber can't do multipoint... so that would obviously be a reason
to use AC.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:12 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller
<par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
af won't do multipoint, right?
:)
----- Original Message -----
From: Mathew Howard
To: af
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link?
Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all the
way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it
needs done in the next couple weeks.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units.
The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have
airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently differences in
airprism between the two which means they will always be limited to ptp or
ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a permanent separation.
The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are
going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy features
like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this point is the
lack of DFS and UNII-1.
I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this
point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should perform best
of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at this point. I expect
AF5x to be better than any of them in every way.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only
connectorized units?
What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism
only?
Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we
already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP
parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know
whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is
this two things that are going to converge?
Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is
there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of performance?
(future demand is a factor as well)
Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three
products there?
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
