A lot of the products that WISPs use have historically had sketchy (and
ever changing) SNMP support which is probably one reason he is acting the
way that he is.  I am -not- making an excuse for his behavior or attitude;
just stating a fact.

Josh

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:44 AM, WaveDirect <li...@wavedirect.org> wrote:

> Just shows you what sort "person" this guy is. Let him rot in his own
> cesspool of hate.  He just saw a bunch of work ahead of him that would
> benefit a great deal of people, took a half assed stab at it and then said
> "naw I'm too lazy I don't want to do it."
>
> Its a classic case of cognitive dissonance.  I'd like to do it,  but its
> too hard therefore I don't want to do it and screw you I can't do it so I
> hate all of you.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 9:00:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What Adam Armstrong of Observium thinks of WISPS
>
> What does Adam Armstrong’s Linkedin profile say “Wispa Connoisseur”?  He
> likes Wispa candy bars?  It seems ironic if he looks down on WISPs.
>
>
> From: David Milholen
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 7:27 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What Adam Armstrong of Observium thinks of WISPS
>
> Some folks in the coding world think they have the million dollar code and
> is above everyone else when in reality they suck at everything else
> and only have a decent piece of code nothing more.  This is where open
> source gets versatile and ugly at times because someone that is willing
> to build the initial code to a higher standard can see the flaws others
> have made and fix what needs to be fixed.
> These are the guys who make open source a great place to play.
>
> Our entire core is built around open source our VMs and phy servers are
> all open source. I dont have a single windows machine in my office now.
> I did have an old XP machine to run linkplanner but WINE has come a long
> way so now I run it on my Debian console with no issue.
>
> all of our techs use small laptops with either crashbang linux or Lubuntu
> on them to allow them to switch between networks quickly.
> Our Senior tech can be in and out of a home in less than 40min with
> contract and paid invoice.
> up until last year we made the change to move all tech laptops to linux.
>
>
>
> On 3/31/2015 5:01 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
>   I haven't paid him a dime, but it does many things very well.
>
>   It's like the guy that made the badass bandwidth shaper years ago. He
> was a tool, but people still bought it because it was the best at what it
> did.
>
>   Eventually someone else will make something better and not be a tool,
> but that's where we're at for now.
>
>
>
>
>   -----
>   Mike Hammett
>   Intelligent Computing Solutions
>   http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   From: "Lists" mailto:li...@wavedirect.org
>   To: af@afmug.com
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 10:41:11 AM
>   Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What Adam Armstrong of Observium thinks of WISPS
>
>   So write a good product = you can treat customers (yes I paid the sub)
> however you want.  Belittle industries publically without consequence?
>
>   Why are you apologizing for him? The means justifies the end?  I think
> its because you are probably the person who paid him to put the Trango Apex
> code in as well as other things and are invested.
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: "Mike Hammett" mailto:af...@ics-il.net
>   To: af@afmug.com
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 11:38:00 AM
>   Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What Adam Armstrong of Observium thinks of WISPS
>
>   Lots of people do just that because it's the best at what it does do.
>
>
>
>
>   -----
>   Mike Hammett
>   Intelligent Computing Solutions
>   http://www.ics-il.com
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>
>   From: "Lists" mailto:li...@wavedirect.org
>   To: af@afmug.com
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 10:36:39 AM
>   Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What Adam Armstrong of Observium thinks of WISPS
>
>   Also a total douchebag and has scared more than one person away from his
> product with his personality. I openly admitted to him his product was
> great but the lack of flexibility will be his downfall. Nobody will want to
> do business with a person like this who openly calls you and everything you
> work for a "retard"
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: "Mike Hammett" mailto:af...@ics-il.net
>   To: af@afmug.com
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 11:33:07 AM
>   Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What Adam Armstrong of Observium thinks of WISPS
>
>   Adam is very strong in his beliefs. that said, they're usually founded
> on something concrete.
>
>
>
>
>   -----
>   Mike Hammett
>   Intelligent Computing Solutions
>   http://www.ics-il.com
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>
>   From: "Lists" mailto:li...@wavedirect.org
>   To: af@afmug.com
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 10:09:41 AM
>   Subject: [AFMUG] What Adam Armstrong of Observium thinks of WISPS
>
>
>
>
>   This was on the channel #observium in open public chat (not private).
> Its pruned to take out some joins/parts useless info etc. I simply asked
> about support for Cambium and now we know exactly what he thinks of "wifi
> people". This guy is a true professional. Funny they think Mikrotik is
> "ghetto". Sure he makes some valid points about the lack of unity in our
> MIBS. I liked his product for our infrastructure, switches, routers etc.
> But I think I can get by without his product from now on. This is the
> luxury of having many independent monitoring systems. It lacks any real
> alerting system or agents for servers anyway. I literally started off with
> that sentence. He added some cambium support a few months ago so I wanted
> to know if more was coming.
>
>   [09:34] <Smeghead> any chance of adding more cambium stuff soon? :)
>   [09:34] <adama> are they another bunch of fucktards who make a new set
> of mibs for every product?
>   [09:35] <adama> everyone involved in wireless seems to be literally
> retarded when it comes to writing mibs
>   [09:37] <adama> yup, they are
>   [09:38] <Smeghead> Yeah so I guess we shouldn't support it then and all
> the millions of units out there.
>   [09:38] <adama> different set of mibs for every fuckign product
>   [09:38] <adama> jesus
>   [09:38] <Smeghead> They unified one of their mibs with the regular AP's
>   [09:38] <adama> can you english?
>   [09:39] <Smeghead> The interface stuff is the same for all of them
>   [09:39] <Smeghead> its your standard interface mibs. Other than that
> really there is MAYBE 10 unique things per different product
>   [09:40] <adama> fucking wifi people
>   [09:40] <adama> you guys have 12903819023810 products from 129381 vendors
>   [09:40] <Smeghead> If you want to be thorough with them you could pull
> all sorts of stuff out.
>   [09:40] <adama> and you're always whining that we should support the
> stuff you want
>   [09:40] <adama> well fuck you all
>   [09:40] <Smeghead> Yeah thats my fault as a consumer of those products.
>   [09:41] <Smeghead> All I want to do is monitor the best.. Cambium is the
> biggest and most widely used next to Ubiquiti.. so I'd stick to supporting
> those 2 fully
>   [09:41] <adama> meh
>   [09:41] <adama> get them to send us hardware
>   [09:41] <adama> and maybe we'll give a shit
>   [09:43] <Smeghead> I'll see if we can send you cambium for sure. I could
> even arrange you a login or set you up a vm on the network so you can probe
> some equipment we have plugged in in a separate environment for you.
>   [09:43] <Smeghead> I'm pretty sure I offered a few times.
>   [09:49] <Smeghead> to be honest though - I don't think observium is
> really hugely needed for AP's and subcribers. Maybe starting with just the
> wireless bridges first would be the best start. That isn't so overwhelming
>   [09:57] <adama> you might as well go and hassle jaguar engineers about
> how they really should build a pickup truck
>   [09:57] <adama> i'm a telco/isp network person, i don't give 2 shits
> about wireless
>   [09:57] <Smeghead> Who do you think delivers internet to the massive
> areas between the major cities?
>   [09:58] <adama> i dunno, are we talking about retarded countries or not?
>   [09:58] <Smeghead> Yeah all of the Western hemisphere..
>   [09:59] <adama> lol
>   [09:59] <adama> XD
>   [10:01] <adama> my patience for people asking for wireless stuff ran out
> long ago
>   [10:01] <Smeghead> Well if you want more excuses to neglect a high
> percentage of industry in the world that delivers internet.. yeah take this
> one. Its probably too hard and too much work for you. Because the wireless
> industry is retarded.
>   [10:01] <adama> i know it is
>   [10:02] <Smeghead> Yet I can make some cacti graphs in a few mins for
> anything. Cacti is old and busted. Your product is new and refreshing. That
> is why the industry is bugging you.
>   [10:04] <adama> go and make some cacti graphs then
>   [10:04] <adama> i'm really fucking sick of this shit
>   [10:04] <adama> it doesn't take 5 minutes to add support for things
>   [10:04] <adama> especially no nfucking wireless stuff
>   [10:04] <adama> so just fuck off
>   [10:04] <adama> it's not going to happen
>   [10:04] <adama> and every one who asks makes it less likely to happen
>   [ 10:06] <Smeghead> But I'll bet if you asked for help you'd get it.
> Look I was willing to set you up a network with all the devices you need
>   [10:06] <adama> excuse me whilst i replace these 32*10G bundles with
> some wireless
>   [10:06] <adama> HURR
>   [10:06] <adama> no
>   [10:06] <adama> i'd get a pile of useless shitty code
>   [10:06] <adama> that's the only thing we've ever gotten from the
> "community"
>   [10:09] <aden> adama: make Observium -3rd world edition, that only
> supports mikrotik and ghetto wireless hardware
>   [10:09] <adama> hah
>   [10:10] <Smeghead> Mainly because its (Mikrotik) like 10% of the price
> and does the same job and even better in many cases.
>   [10:11] <adama> no, they use it because it "just about works" and costs
> 10% of the price
>   [10:11] <Smeghead> Dragonwave aint ghetto nor some of these other
> backhaul manufacturers.
>   [10:12] <Smeghead> and your proof is from what experience?
>   [10:12] <Smeghead> Sounds like a case of "they suck over there" and "I
> know all about them, I've never worked in the industry or actually been a
> part of any of it but I know what I'm talking about".
>   [10:13] <Smeghead> Those crazy brown people and their silly ways. They
> are inferior to us.
>   [10:13] <adama> man, this is exactly the kind of shit that made us go
> commercial in the first place
>   [10:14] <adama> dude
>   [10:14] <adama> just fuck off
>   [10:14] <adama> you're getting really tiring now
>   [10:14] <Smeghead> It takes 10x more effort to deliver internet to
> remote people.. not to mention flexibility and creativity.
>   [10:14] <Smeghead> Than some pompous pricks sitting in their offices
>   [10:15] <adama> so what was that, remove any existing wireless support
> and hope everyone else fucks off too?
>   [10:16] <adama> ok then!
>   [10:16] <Smeghead> Hahh what wireless support?
>   [10:16] * ChanServ sets mode: +o adama
>   [10:16] * You were kicked by adama (Smeghead)
>   Session Close: Tue Mar 31 10:16:22 2015
>
>
>
>
> --
>

Reply via email to