Do you think it's something u can use in a production environment? On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 2:25 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:
> Yes, I clearly understand how to implement. Just was wondering if someone > offered it turn-key. > > I'm thinking that mikrotik won't be turn key, might be a big hassle to > make and keep it working > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >> No, I'm suggesting you locate a Mikrotik box in the datacenter where you >> can get the BGP connection(s). Put a Mikrotik (or more) on the ends of the >> broadband fiber connections. VPN from them back to the MT at the >> datacenter. Your BGP stays at the datacenter, you use the VPNs as internal >> connectivity to the rest of the network. >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange >> http://midwest-ix.com/ >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Sunday, April 19, 2015 4:13:09 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >> >> I can't comprehend that, are you offering to do hosted bonding with BGP >> for me using a mikrotik? >> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >> >>> April 18, 2015 8:44 AM >>> >>> ===== >>> I'm assuming a Mikrotik at a datacenter where you do BGP with a tunnel >>> to the destination router's IPs per upstream port. OSPF magic over the >>> different tunnels. >>> ===== >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Sunday, April 19, 2015 12:23:09 AM >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>> >>> Which one? >>> On Apr 18, 2015 9:07 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >>> >>>> My proposal still stands. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> >>>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:23:11 PM >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>> >>>> I'm not talking about any bgp stuff guys, I'm talking about the ability >>>> to bond several non bgp lines into one virtual pipe that is bgp capable >>>> (i.e. with a mikrotik in a data center who can give a bgp session) not >>>> talking about bonding multiple bgp capable lines, etc >>>> On Apr 18, 2015 4:54 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> No community support, no business. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.onesc.net/communities/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> *From: *"Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> >>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>>>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:42:08 PM >>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>>> >>>>> I have used communities a lot... The problem is non-standard support >>>>> and no support at all from some of the transit providers… >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 3:35 PM >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Must not have used communities much? You can exert a lot of control >>>>> with them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> *From: *"Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> >>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>>>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 2:32:31 PM >>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>>> >>>>> Yeah the inbound part I’m really skeptical over… >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:43 AM >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Through communities, local prefs, etc. and a few upstreams, you can >>>>> shape your traffic quite a bit. The InterNAP box is the only one I'm aware >>>>> of that'll do inbound. Noction has a box that does outbound only and they >>>>> were working on inbound, but last I knew hadn't finished it yet. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> *From: *"Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> >>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>>>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:26:49 AM >>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>>> >>>>> There’s a few of them out there.. I have yet to understand why I would >>>>> want to buy a big expensive box (and they are NOT cheap) to influence my >>>>> outbound BGP traffic, knowing that like humans, we can only influence >>>>> inbound BGP traffic a very limited amount. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2015 9:34 PM >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> A few years ago some company proposed an appliance that proclaimed to >>>>> manage bgp for multiple circuits. Don't know if the they are still around. >>>>> I personally don't think it is a good investment as so much of the bgp >>>>> equation depends on the carrier. >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 17, 2015 2:47 PM, "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Anyone know of a service that can take several small business fiber >>>>> circuits that don't support bgp and bond them and provide a bgp session ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
