Multiplied Networks has a solution for that … I’ve only seen demo and it looked pretty good .. going to be building a proof of concept with their stuff in another month …
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of TJ Trout Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:23 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream I'm not talking about any bgp stuff guys, I'm talking about the ability to bond several non bgp lines into one virtual pipe that is bgp capable (i.e. with a mikrotik in a data center who can give a bgp session) not talking about bonding multiple bgp capable lines, etc On Apr 18, 2015 4:54 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net <mailto:af...@ics-il.net> > wrote: No community support, no business. http://www.onesc.net/communities/ ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> _____ From: "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org <mailto:p...@paulstewart.org> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:42:08 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream I have used communities a lot... The problem is non-standard support and no support at all from some of the transit providers… From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 3:35 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream Must not have used communities much? You can exert a lot of control with them. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> _____ From: "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org <mailto:p...@paulstewart.org> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 2:32:31 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream Yeah the inbound part I’m really skeptical over… From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:43 AM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream Through communities, local prefs, etc. and a few upstreams, you can shape your traffic quite a bit. The InterNAP box is the only one I'm aware of that'll do inbound. Noction has a box that does outbound only and they were working on inbound, but last I knew hadn't finished it yet. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> _____ From: "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org <mailto:p...@paulstewart.org> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:26:49 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream There’s a few of them out there.. I have yet to understand why I would want to buy a big expensive box (and they are NOT cheap) to influence my outbound BGP traffic, knowing that like humans, we can only influence inbound BGP traffic a very limited amount. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 9:34 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream A few years ago some company proposed an appliance that proclaimed to manage bgp for multiple circuits. Don't know if the they are still around. I personally don't think it is a good investment as so much of the bgp equation depends on the carrier. On Apr 17, 2015 2:47 PM, "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com <mailto:t...@voltbb.com> > wrote: Anyone know of a service that can take several small business fiber circuits that don't support bgp and bond them and provide a bgp session ?
