Just FYI, I talked with them quite a bit, and they considered Peter's
8-sector configuration to be somewhat "non kosher". They preferred not
using the outer sectors, as the gain was sub-optimum. So they suggested
that a 6-sector configuration would actually work much better (same as
Peter's, just not using the 2 outer sectors).
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 4/20/2015 12:56 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
We were worried about that as well. After talking to ETI, we may be
doing a trial with one of their APs, 6 RM5AC-PTMP, with a bag of RPSMA
notch filters on hand.
There are some things that I'm seeing that I'm not liking though,
mainly gain on the edge beams.
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com
On 04/20/2015 11:53 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Check with Peter. I think if you used a non-sync AP, the front end
receivers would be overloaded.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 4/20/2015 12:49 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
After looking at how the system is setup and talking to ET, that
doesn't seem to be the case.
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com
On 04/20/2015 11:47 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
but but... your going to have to use a sync capable AP if you want
to use these (I believe). Isn't that against your religion?
Mark
On 4/20/15 2:03 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
The quote we received was very do-able. Roughly $6,500. If they
work we'll buy a lot more.
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com
On 04/20/2015 09:54 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I met with the company in New Jersey. Everything sounded awesome.
We never pulled the trigger because they were a bit too large and
a bit too expensive.
I imagine you're in the same spot.
On 4/20/2015 1:48 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Does anybody here have experience with these?
Hit me up off list.
Thanks
