Yes, you certainly can.  And we have.  But to my mind, we shouldn’t have
needed to.  The algorithm that decides on the best channel shouldn’t have
picked what it did.

 

And I’m sure that, as they tweak things, the radios will make better
decisions.  Or maybe there’ll be a ‘play nice, this is my tower’ or ‘play
dirty, and assume all interference is external’ toggle.  Or something.

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 11:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mimosa

 

You can carve out any or as many parts of the spectrum to prohibit the B5
from using as you wish.�� You can do the same for the PTP600.

Mark

On 5/20/15 11:19 AM, Shayne Lebrun wrote:

Well, I�ve seen mine, more than once, decide �hey, I�ll use an 80 mhz
channel, despite that giant 20mhz wide spike, right in the middle, �caused
by the PTP600 that�s sitting on the same tower! Yay!�� Then the PTP600
goes to crap.

�

�

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 11:04 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mimosa

�

Yea. They are late now ;-)).

�

Auto everything is a great Idea. With two distinct channels they even have
the chance to test a channel without dropping the link. 

�

�

Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Shayne Lebrun
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2015 15:44
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] mimosa

�

They�re good little radios, but they need some seasoning. ��auto
everything� mode makes what I would consider to be some questionable
choices, for example.� Also, zero SNMP support at this point, which makes
things impossible to monitor/diagnose after the fact.

�

We�re eagerly looking forward to the next firmware release, which
supposedly will enable SNMP and same-tower coordination.

�

�

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 9:33 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mimosa

�

I�ve got 10 of them up and they have worked great.� As for mixing it
with Cambium gear, that�s a tough one.� Because there is no
interoperability with GPS between manufacturers, you have to rely on normal
isolation methods.� You probably want to keep them at least 10 apart or
more.� On the one tower where I was concerned about the issue and another
location where I have a lot of 5GHz radios, Ubiquiti, and others on the same
roof, I�m using the Jirous dishes with the built-in shrouds and then using
the B5c�s.� I don�t have any comparison to the B5 in that situation, I
just planned for the worst case scenario.� I have another colleague that
is using the B5c�s with Ubiquiti antennas with Ubiquiti shroud on the same
roof because he needed a 34dBi antenna and it�s shooting 32 miles.
��He couldn�t get enough throughput out of the AF5x radios so he
swapped to the Mimosa and he is getting 2-3 times more throughput, about
200Mbps.

�

Rory

�

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Mano
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 6:20 AM
To: 'af@afmug.com'
Subject: [AFMUG] mimosa

�

Would like to know what your feedback is on the mimosa B5 intergrated�.am
looking to try this out and if its ok to mix with cambium gear on the same
towers

�

thanks

�

�






-- 
 
Mark Radabaugh
m...@amplex.net
419-837-5105 x1021
m...@amplex.net

Reply via email to