I think the "play nice/play dirty" feature would be quite popular if they put it in, but could lead to sour relationships between some companies when they realized to what mode others set their radios. On May 20, 2015 11:30 AM, "Shayne Lebrun" <sleb...@muskoka.com> wrote:
> Yes, you certainly can. And we have. But to my mind, we shouldn’t have > needed to. The algorithm that decides on the best channel shouldn’t have > picked what it did. > > > > And I’m sure that, as they tweak things, the radios will make better > decisions. Or maybe there’ll be a ‘play nice, this is my tower’ or ‘play > dirty, and assume all interference is external’ toggle. Or something. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Radabaugh > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 11:28 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mimosa > > > > You can carve out any or as many parts of the spectrum to prohibit the B5 > from using as you wish.�� You can do the same for the PTP600. > > Mark > > On 5/20/15 11:19 AM, Shayne Lebrun wrote: > > Well, I�ve seen mine, more than once, decide �hey, I�ll use an 80 > mhz channel, despite that giant 20mhz wide spike, right in the middle, > �caused by the PTP600 that�s sitting on the same tower! Yay!�� Then > the PTP600 goes to crap. > > � > > � > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Stefan Englhardt > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 11:04 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mimosa > > � > > Yea. They are late now ;-)). > > � > > Auto everything is a great Idea. With two distinct channels they even have > the chance to test a channel without dropping the link. > > � > > � > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *Im > Auftrag von *Shayne Lebrun > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2015 15:44 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] mimosa > > � > > They�re good little radios, but they need some seasoning. ��auto > everything� mode makes what I would consider to be some questionable > choices, for example.� Also, zero SNMP support at this point, which makes > things impossible to monitor/diagnose after the fact. > > � > > We�re eagerly looking forward to the next firmware release, which > supposedly will enable SNMP and same-tower coordination. > > � > > � > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Rory Conaway > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 9:33 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mimosa > > � > > I�ve got 10 of them up and they have worked great.� As for mixing it > with Cambium gear, that�s a tough one.� Because there is no > interoperability with GPS between manufacturers, you have to rely on normal > isolation methods.� You probably want to keep them at least 10 apart or > more.� On the one tower where I was concerned about the issue and another > location where I have a lot of 5GHz radios, Ubiquiti, and others on the > same roof, I�m using the Jirous dishes with the built-in shrouds and then > using the B5c�s.� I don�t have any comparison to the B5 in that > situation, I just planned for the worst case scenario.� I have another > colleague that is using the B5c�s with Ubiquiti antennas with Ubiquiti > shroud on the same roof because he needed a 34dBi antenna and it�s > shooting 32 miles. ��He couldn�t get enough throughput out of the > AF5x radios so he swapped to the Mimosa and he is getting 2-3 times more > throughput, about 200Mbps. > > � > > Rory > > � > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Ryan Mano > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 6:20 AM > *To:* 'af@afmug.com' > *Subject:* [AFMUG] mimosa > > � > > Would like to know what your feedback is on the mimosa B5 > intergrated�.am looking to try this out and if its ok to mix with cambium > gear on the same towers > > � > > thanks > > � > > � > > > > > -- > > > > Mark Radabaugh > > m...@amplex.net > > 419-837-5105 x1021 > > m...@amplex.net > >
