i dont understand why the pop routers wouldnt just distribute connected. In not questioning to be a dick, I just dont understand. I cant see any reason there would be a route on a pop router under normal circumstances that i wouldnt want distributed? I have a total of three days of production OSPF so, though I know this makes me a secialist, Im wanting to learn
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> wrote: > Ok. That’s a way ;-)). > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Faisal Imtiaz > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 15:52 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question > > > > >>. Doing this you enable ospf on the interfaces with addresses within > x.x.x.x/x. > > This is not wanted on all edge networks/customer networks. > > > > You are absolutely right Stefan, my colleagues failed to mention > (assumed), that you should put all your physical interfaces in the OSPF > interface and set them up as passive :) > > > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Thursday, May 21, 2015 9:45:04 AM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question > > > > Doing this you enable ospf on the interfaces with addresses within > x.x.x.x/x. > > This is not wanted on all edge networks/customer networks. > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *Im > Auftrag von *Shayne Lebrun > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 15:33 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question > > > > You tell the router what routes to redistribute, rather than telling the > router to redistribute everything that’s there. > > > > There’s never a reason not to simply take the extra five seconds to type > ‘/routing ospf network add network=x.x.x.x/x area=whatever’. > > > > There’s a lot of very good reasons not to, however. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Stefan Englhardt > *Sent:* Thursday, May 21, 2015 8:16 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question > > > > Looked twice at this. How does your network know the route to a network > connected to one of your routers if he does not redistribute this > information into ospf? > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *Im > Auftrag von *Dennis Burgess > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 14:10 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question > > > > There are about 0 times when you should distribute connected, just a FYI. > 99% of the time it causes issues with unintended and/or unneeded > distribution of routes .. > > > > Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. > > den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Gilbert Gutierrez > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:47 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question > > > > Are you redistributing Connected? If the /30 is not on the networks tab, > then you will need to redistribute connected routes. If you add static > routes pointing to places you will want to redistribute static routes as > well. > > > > Gilbert > > On 5/20/2015 1:03 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > So I have this here mikrotik Ive been implementing ospf on > > Right now because this is transition, all MT ports hit the same switch > > Eth6 is on a /30 that is going to a powercode BMU thats distributing the > default route, it works fine > > Eth2 is on a /30 that is going to a fortigate, it works fine > > > > the routes propagate as they should > > > > I initially tried to add another /30 to Eth2 for a second fortigate, but > it wouldnt let me add the netwok > > so I put that /30 on eth3 it comes up in a state designated router > > > > I moved it to eth4, same thing designated router the other two that are > working have said backup all along > > > > is there something about adding a third ospf interface to mikrotik i need > to know here? > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
