Maybe they haven't been struck down by lightning yet... but just wait, you'll see.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > It’s a religious topic. Don’t go there. Be assured though that some > infidels do redistribute connected (and even statics with an ACL) and have > not been struck down by lightning. > > *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, May 21, 2015 10:59 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question > > i dont understand why the pop routers wouldnt just distribute connected. > In not questioning to be a dick, I just dont understand. I cant see any > reason there would be a route on a pop router under normal circumstances > that i wouldnt want distributed? I have a total of three days of production > OSPF so, though I know this makes me a secialist, Im wanting to learn > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ok. That’s a way ;-)). >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Faisal Imtiaz >> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 15:52 >> *An:* [email protected] >> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question >> >> >> >> >>. Doing this you enable ospf on the interfaces with addresses within >> x.x.x.x/x. >> >> This is not wanted on all edge networks/customer networks. >> >> >> >> You are absolutely right Stefan, my colleagues failed to mention >> (assumed), that you should put all your physical interfaces in the OSPF >> interface and set them up as passive :) >> >> >> >> >> >> Faisal Imtiaz >> Snappy Internet & Telecom >> 7266 SW 48 Street >> Miami, FL 33155 >> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 >> >> >> >> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Thursday, May 21, 2015 9:45:04 AM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question >> >> >> >> Doing this you enable ospf on the interfaces with addresses within >> x.x.x.x/x. >> >> This is not wanted on all edge networks/customer networks. >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *Im >> Auftrag von *Shayne Lebrun >> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 15:33 >> *An:* [email protected] >> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question >> >> >> >> You tell the router what routes to redistribute, rather than telling the >> router to redistribute everything that’s there. >> >> >> >> There’s never a reason not to simply take the extra five seconds to type >> ‘/routing ospf network add network=x.x.x.x/x area=whatever’. >> >> >> >> There’s a lot of very good reasons not to, however. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Stefan Englhardt >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 21, 2015 8:16 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question >> >> >> >> Looked twice at this. How does your network know the route to a network >> connected to one of your routers if he does not redistribute this >> information into ospf? >> >> >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *Im >> Auftrag von *Dennis Burgess >> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 14:10 >> *An:* [email protected] >> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question >> >> >> >> There are about 0 times when you should distribute connected, just a >> FYI. 99% of the time it causes issues with unintended and/or unneeded >> distribution of routes .. >> >> >> >> Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. >> >> [email protected] – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Gilbert Gutierrez >> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:47 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question >> >> >> >> Are you redistributing Connected? If the /30 is not on the networks tab, >> then you will need to redistribute connected routes. If you add static >> routes pointing to places you will want to redistribute static routes as >> well. >> >> >> >> Gilbert >> >> On 5/20/2015 1:03 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >> >> So I have this here mikrotik Ive been implementing ospf on >> >> Right now because this is transition, all MT ports hit the same switch >> >> Eth6 is on a /30 that is going to a powercode BMU thats distributing the >> default route, it works fine >> >> Eth2 is on a /30 that is going to a fortigate, it works fine >> >> >> >> the routes propagate as they should >> >> >> >> I initially tried to add another /30 to Eth2 for a second fortigate, but >> it wouldnt let me add the netwok >> >> so I put that /30 on eth3 it comes up in a state designated router >> >> >> >> I moved it to eth4, same thing designated router the other two that are >> working have said backup all along >> >> >> >> is there something about adding a third ospf interface to mikrotik i need >> to know here? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your > team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
