Mama taught me that if I have nothing nice to say to not say anything at all.
:] -Steve D On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: > Yea, but if some investor sees it, you will have a Fatwa put out on you. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown > *Sent:* Thursday, May 21, 2015 8:37 AM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mimosa > > > > We say negative stuff about each other every day... > > Kinda like a locker room in here. > > > > *From:* Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Thursday, May 21, 2015 8:37 AM > > *To:* af <[email protected]> > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mimosa > > > > This is afmug... we say negative stuff about Ubiquiti everyday :P > > I don't find it hard to believe that the Mimosa is getting a lot better > throughput in this particular situation, but it would be really interesting > to know how the two compared using the exact same channels.... probably not > actually possible to know at this point, since I'm assuming he had the AF5x > on a 50mhz channel, which can't done on a Mimosa. > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Don’t have your answer, only the results and the radios are running 40x40, > split channels. I do know he doesn’t want to get into a battle with > everyone over this issue and I don’t blame him. Mention something negative > about Ubiquiti and you get investigated and accused of everything from > stealing candy from babies to taking payoffs from multiple sides and trying > to short sell the stock. He saw the lies and false accusations I had to go > through on SeekingAlpha and he doesn’t want any part of that. Nobody > wants the facts, more important to attack the messenger. This gentlemen > also has 30 more years in the radio industry than I do so I respect what he > says. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 6:52 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mimosa > > > > This story doesn't make a bit of sense. > > There would only be a handful of reasons he couldn't get "enough > throughput with AF5x radios", but could with a B5. > If it's noise, well, the AF5X is going to handle adjacent and co-channel > noise better than the B5, given the same channel widths and channel > selection. > > There are certain situations where if everything was perfect and you were > using a PAIR of 40MHz channels, that you could pull it off... but given you > said it's a busy site, I'm not thinking that's the case. > > I'd love to learn more about that deployment. > > Josh Reynolds > > CIO, SPITwSPOTS > > www.spitwspots.com > > On 05/20/2015 05:33 AM, Rory Conaway wrote: > > I�ve got 10 of them up and they have worked great.� As for mixing it > with Cambium gear, that�s a tough one.� Because there is no > interoperability with GPS between manufacturers, you have to rely on normal > isolation methods.� You probably want to keep them at least 10 apart or > more.� On the one tower where I was concerned about the issue and another > location where I have a lot of 5GHz radios, Ubiquiti, and others on the > same roof, I�m using the Jirous dishes with the built-in shrouds and then > using the B5c�s.� I don�t have any comparison to the B5 in that > situation, I just planned for the worst case scenario.� I have another > colleague that is using the B5c�s with Ubiquiti antennas with Ubiquiti > shroud on the same roof because he needed a 34dBi antenna and it�s > shooting 32 miles. ��He couldn�t get enough throughput out of the > AF5x radios so he swapped to the Mimosa and he is getting 2-3 times more > throughput, about 200Mbps. > > � > > Rory > > � > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Ryan Mano > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 6:20 AM > *To:* '[email protected]' > *Subject:* [AFMUG] mimosa > > � > > Would like to know what your feedback is on the mimosa B5 > intergrated�.am looking to try this out and if its ok to mix with cambium > gear on the same towers > > � > > thanks > > � > > � > > > > >
