Yes
On 6/3/2015 8:16 PM, Jon Langeler wrote:
Replacing UBNT with what? 450?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2015, at 8:08 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com
<mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
I don't buy the LTE NLOS pitch. It's too goddamn expensive to get
good performance (3 or 4 4x4 sectors instead of a dual omni or split
2x2 sectors) to put 30, 40 or even 50 customers on a site which is
all we have in rural areas. We'll never make any money buying Telrad.
I can put up 4 sectors of 450 for ONE Telrad.
I get it though. Standardized stuff is nice. But if you don't have
the customers for it to make sense financially, all that goes out the
window.
We never deployed any 320. And we're ripping out UBNT 3.65 as fast as
possible.
On 6/3/2015 4:08 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs. We
have a dream of Telrad working out to save the day with their
firmware load. Some creative Telrad AP deployments gradually
replacing the 320 APs, utilizing the 320 CPEs until we migrate the
site to LTE with telrad CPEs, giving us 320 CPEs to redeploy.
The dream is somebody will write some magic code to sit on an
intermediary server to communicate with the FCC database thing so we
can redeploy the 320 APs to small sites.
We had two test sites for the 450. One site landlord hasnt allowed
us up there to swap equipment, we have to deal with that on the
lease side and our other 450 test site has only 3 users on it with
good links so we havent been able to test the 1x magic out.
I would have preferred to more aggressively pursue the 450 and be
able to sell higher throughput higher dollar connections, to offset
the potential nlos customers we would lose. something about being
able to sync with competitors down the road seemed like a good idea
to me, especially with an AP with 3x the throughput and the whole
not using gear thats end of life, but i am but a lowly sysadmin with
no access to the purse strings.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Paul McCall <pa...@pdmnet.net
<mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net>> wrote:
I am just curious how many of you have decided to keep using the
320 series because it goes through trees a lot better than the
450 series 3.65 product?
Are you expanding with it as far as towers go? Or, are you just
adding SMs to what you already have?
Paul
Paul McCall, Pres.
PDMNet / Florida Broadband
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800 <tel:772-564-6800> office
772-473-0352 <tel:772-473-0352> cell
www.pdmnet.com <http://www.pdmnet.com/>
pa...@pdmnet.net <mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net>
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
