I wouldn't say "through" but over a slight ridge for sure blocking visual LOS and intruding most of the 1st fresnel zone.
-Sean On Saturday, June 13, 2015, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: > How does LTE penetrate hills? This is the second or third "through a hill" > story in the last week? > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','patrick.le...@telrad.com');>> wrote: > >> RSRP, it is a measurement. It is a truer number than RSSI, which is >> only an estimate (so I'm told). As Ken said, basically add 30 to get an >> idea of the RSSI value. >> >> *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID* >> On Jun 13, 2015 5:36 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mhoward...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >> Yeah... something like that. Notice that is -108 CINR, not RSSI, like >> the numbers we're all used to. >> >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af...@kwisp.com');>> wrote: >> >>> I think Patrick said to add 30 dB to Telrad signal numbers because >>> they were “per subcarrier” or something? >>> >>> *From:* Colin Stanners >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cstann...@gmail.com');> >>> *Sent:* Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:17 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Do you want to see this stuff here? >>> >>> Patrick, I haven't been following Telrad but that's too incredible - >>> I can't see how -108, which is below the noise floor for any reasonable >>> channel bandwidth (20mhz+?) could get any reasonable speed, much less >>> those. >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','patrick.le...@telrad.com');>> wrote: >>> >>>> Should I resist sharing this sort of thing? If it's out of line, let >>>> me know Chuck. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','telrad-boun...@wispa.org');> [mailto: >>>> telrad-boun...@wispa.org >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','telrad-boun...@wispa.org');>] On Behalf >>>> Of Steve Discher >>>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:51 PM >>>> To: tel...@wispa.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tel...@wispa.org');> >>>> Subject: [Telrad] Another Telrad success story >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Not to flood the list with these but Zirkel is having great results. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> >>>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >>>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer >>>> viruses. >>>> >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >>>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >>>> computer viruses. >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >
