Does it fit?
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> To: "af" <af@afmug.com> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 4:49:52 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] baby rb1100ah2 The 2011 is nice, but the CPU is a bit underpowered for larger sites... the RB850Gx2 has a decent CPU, but it's only got 5 ports. The RB3011 should be perfect, if it ever ships. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Ken Hohhof < af...@kwisp.com > wrote: That says RB2011 is OK. Or a CRS125. As long as that’s enough CPU for you. From: Mike Hammett Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] baby rb1100ah2 http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Maximum_Transmission_Unit_on_RouterBoards ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Adam Moffett" < dmmoff...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:24:57 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] baby rb1100ah2 2011? Similar CPU. On 6/18/2015 2:51 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: <blockquote> I wouldn't deploy RB493s, they limit your MTU. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Adam Moffett" mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 1:48:34 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] baby rb1100ah2 How small of a site though? 493G is ok for 100mbps+ <blockquote> Nothing I'd recommend, currently. the RB3011 should be here in the next couple weeks. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:40:39 PM Subject: [AFMUG] baby rb1100ah2 whats a comparable 8 or so port unit to this? Small footprint for tiny sites and tiny enclosures -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> </blockquote>
