FCC doesn't currently allow channel bonding (as far as I know)
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Runcomm talks about ~20 meg per channel, two channels. Real throughput. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Sean Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af...@zirkel.us');>> > *To: *af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Sent: *Tuesday, June 23, 2015 5:54:33 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Has anyone used TVWS? > > Channels are to narrow to do much more than 5-10mbps aggregate. > > Have you tried Telrad 3.65 LTE? Works great for us. > > -Sean > > > On Tuesday, June 23, 2015, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mhoward...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> Does anyone here have any experience with any TV white space gear? We >> have an area which we are having difficulty covering because of tree issues >> and TVWS seems like it might be viable. >> >> The only realistic looking options I see are Carlson and Runcomm, but I >> have absolutely no experience with either one. >> > >
