http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-1000/Force110-ptp-success-story/m-p/38263
If you have experience with NanoBeams and are looking to improve the link, absolutely read this story. The antennas are definitely a bit better but the radios are probably always going to be at least somewhat subjective - my experience on this link should help you decide on that. Note: The force110 ptp radios/GPS stuff isn't really relevant to the link itself. The sync only fixes self-interference. You could just as easily use the $100 force110 radios with the same results. I used ptp radios there for the extra metal shielding which is probably irrelevant, but I didn't want to climb again in the middle of the winter to save pennies. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net> wrote: > No I did not do you got a link > > > > Josh Heide > > Network Engineer > > Velociter Wireless, Inc. > > (209)838-1221 x108 > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:15 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync > > > > 220 would be perfect. I've had nothing but great RF performance. Did you > see my story about going from Beams to force110? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Jul 21, 2015 1:51 PM, "Joshua Heide" <j...@velociter.net> wrote: > > Looking into these units. Wondering what kind of throughput people are > getting with these. Are you getting the 220mbps real world throughput that > they claim? > > > > Josh Heide > > Network Engineer > > Velociter Wireless, Inc. > > (209)838-1221 x108 > > >
