ePMP is 64QAM. 256 would be nice, but there's always the PTP450 for
that, which of course is limited to 20MHz though. I have a 10 mile ePMP
link on 2' dishes running in the 5.1 band. 20MHz channel. I get 98Mbps
aggregate. I see no reason why a 40MHz channel couldn't do 200Mbps,
maybe a little more.
On 7/21/2015 1:31 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
The answer you are looking for is 802.11ac?
Anyway, I guess I’m mistaken and 220M may be the right number for
256QAM in 40 MHz. Assuming the planets align and every sub is at max
modulation with no retries.
*From:* Josh Luthman <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 1:23 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
And Mimosa is...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 21, 2015 2:19 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
Really, 220 Mbps in a 40 MHz channel? That’s a bunch for
something based on an 802.11n PHY.
I think the regular Force 110 spec sheet says 150M, does the GPS
sync version really say 220M? I’m not disputing it, just
surprised/amazed.
*From:* Josh Luthman <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 1:15 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
220 would be perfect. I've had nothing but great RF performance.
Did you see my story about going from Beams to force110?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 21, 2015 1:51 PM, "Joshua Heide" <j...@velociter.net
<mailto:j...@velociter.net>> wrote:
Looking into these units. Wondering what kind of throughput
people are getting with these. Are you getting the 220mbps
real world throughput that they claim?
Josh Heide
Network Engineer
Velociter Wireless, Inc.
(209)838-1221 x108 <tel:%28209%29838-1221%20x108>
