Oh for backhauls yes. I thought you were talking about those last mile extra bumps from the grain leg to home.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 9, 2015 7:22 PM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > Well, it's a big deal to me after two or three links. And there's no > reason to go licensed on these paths (yet). > > On 8/9/2015 4:59 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Hmm I never had a problem getting them started. FWIW I'm getting 1-2 ms > from my desktop, through my router/eptp/switches at the tower down to our > BMU. > > I also don't think 20ms is that big a deal for most customers. If they > get say 60ms from their machine to most anything in a datacenter they > should be better off than most cable/dsl circuits, no? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:55 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > >> Yes. Ran out of time and had to get the link back up. Could've been >> something else stupid I overlooked though. I'll mess with a pair in the >> office next week. >> >> On 8/9/2015 4:48 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> Did you set the slave to eptp slave? They use different drivers. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Aug 9, 2015 5:41 PM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: >> >>> OK so back to ePMP PTP. I had to put up a 500' link between two grain >>> legs. Used integrated radios on 2.4.3. I tried ePTP, but they wouldn't link >>> up. Thinking maybe too short? I don't know, so I just switched them to TDD >>> PTP w/ flexible framing instead. Latency is like 15ms. I hate it. I have a >>> couple other links still on 2.3.3 also doing flexible framing and latency >>> is very consistently 7ms. Only thing I can think is that this new short >>> link is on 5.4GHz and it's actually forcing fixed framing (even though it >>> says flexible) because of DFS? Either that or something is very different >>> between 2.3.3 and 2.4.3. >>> >>> Anyway.. we were thinking about switching out a bunch of 5GHz Rocket >>> links (because they cannot handle noise at all) with ePMP GPS. We get very >>> good latency with the Rockets, typically under 3ms when the front ends >>> aren't swamped, but I will NOT do 15-20ms with ePMP, that's just stupid. >>> The whole idea was sync, and since ePTP doesn't sync.. not sure what to do. >>> Maybe 2.5ms framing and 50/50 TDD will get me 7ms, and w/ sync? >>> >> >> > >
