Did you set the slave to eptp slave? They use different drivers. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 9, 2015 5:41 PM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
> OK so back to ePMP PTP. I had to put up a 500' link between two grain > legs. Used integrated radios on 2.4.3. I tried ePTP, but they wouldn't link > up. Thinking maybe too short? I don't know, so I just switched them to TDD > PTP w/ flexible framing instead. Latency is like 15ms. I hate it. I have a > couple other links still on 2.3.3 also doing flexible framing and latency > is very consistently 7ms. Only thing I can think is that this new short > link is on 5.4GHz and it's actually forcing fixed framing (even though it > says flexible) because of DFS? Either that or something is very different > between 2.3.3 and 2.4.3. > > Anyway.. we were thinking about switching out a bunch of 5GHz Rocket links > (because they cannot handle noise at all) with ePMP GPS. We get very good > latency with the Rockets, typically under 3ms when the front ends aren't > swamped, but I will NOT do 15-20ms with ePMP, that's just stupid. The whole > idea was sync, and since ePTP doesn't sync.. not sure what to do. Maybe > 2.5ms framing and 50/50 TDD will get me 7ms, and w/ sync? >
