Interesting to contrast CCR architecture to Cisco’s ASR which also uses a 
massively multicore chip (QFP) for packet processing, but has separate hardware 
for control plane (RP) and data plane (ESP), so no issues with BGP/OSPF 
performance even with huge routing tables and many peers.  Of course at a much 
higher price point.


From: Mike Hammett 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 5:59 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CCR 72 core

JJ was in a three way merger, so he's been really busy lately, but in all kinds 
of new things. I our Skype chat I've proposed that JJ's really rebuilding 
NASA's DSN out of Arduinos.




-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 11:09:10 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CCR 72 core


FWIW I will tune in to any and all podcasts you guys should release. I get 
someone good out of every one. Not to mention, just listening to like-minded 
individuals speak about subjects related to our industry gets my creative 
juices flowing and often I think of something clever or interesting that is 
only tangental to the actual conversation. I love what you guys are doing and 
only wish they were more regular. 

-Ty

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:

  Me too..... It's just that I want to taste to fully baked cake... not the 
half baked one...


  :)


  Faisal Imtiaz
  Snappy Internet & Telecom
  7266 SW 48 Street
  Miami, FL 33155
  Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

  Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: "Joe Novak" <jno...@lrcomm.com>
    To: af@afmug.com
    Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 10:02:46 AM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CCR 72 core

    I just want to see the results with v7 ;) I have high hopes.


    On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> 
wrote:

      No, I was addressing Mike H. in expressing a desire to do a podcast on 
CCR 1072 and not having the time to do so...


      The review from stubarea51 is a good, 3rd party testing piece done 
in-conjunction with MT folks. ( I consider this something similar to Trolly 
Reports). In a way it is nice to see MT working with a 3rd party for testing 
and putting out test reports/test review vs listing their own numbers...


      Regards.




      Faisal Imtiaz
      Snappy Internet & Telecom
      7266 SW 48 Street
      Miami, FL 33155
      Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

      Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: "Joe Novak" <jno...@lrcomm.com>
        To: af@afmug.com
        Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 9:42:00 AM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CCR 72 core

        Faisal, are you talking about the review from stubarea51? 




        On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
<fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:

          Speaking just for myself,  I would not bother listening to such a 
podcast .... 


          Don't get me wrong, not saying anything negative about Mikrotik... 

          Just saying there is very little value to me, in hearing about the 
beta test results of a product that is not in the market (general availability) 
running an Operating System which is also yet to be released..


          Yes, it is supposed to jump over the moon and fly around the world in 
a single leap... Cure World Hunger and Bring Peace on Earth..


          :)


          Once the product is released and both the hardware and the ROS is in 
general availability status... all of the features will end up speaking for 
themselves....


          Stay busy... do something productive...



          :)



          Faisal Imtiaz
          Snappy Internet & Telecom
          7266 SW 48 Street
          Miami, FL 33155
          Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

          Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 


----------------------------------------------------------------------

            From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net>
            To: af@afmug.com
            Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 10:34:32 PM 

            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CCR 72 core


            We've been trying to get a podcast scheduled to talk about the 1072 
(among other things), but everyone's been busy. One of the Andrews beta tested 
it and has been released to talk about his testing. If only everyone wasn't so 
busy.




            -----
            Mike Hammett
            Intelligent Computing Solutions
            http://www.ics-il.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------

            From: "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
            To: af@afmug.com
            Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 9:19:36 PM
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CCR 72 core

            do a bit of googleing and you will find the 'Review' for the CCR1072
            if you go thru it, you will also notice that it was tested with ROS 
v7

            So.. it is what it is with the current ROS 6.x limitations on 
process and cores..
            This behavior is expected to change with ROS 7.x

            :) 

            Faisal Imtiaz
            Snappy Internet & Telecom
            7266 SW 48 Street
            Miami, FL 33155
            Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

            Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.net 

            ----- Original Message -----
            > From: "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
            > To: af@afmug.com
            > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 9:20:48 PM
            > Subject: [AFMUG] CCR 72 core
            > 
            > http://routerboard.com/CCR1072-1G-8Splus
            > 
            > I keep hearing about various things that are single threaded in
            > RouterOS, but they seem to like adding lots of cores.
            > 
            > Is there a definitive list somewhere of what processes can take
            > advantage of multiple cores?
            > 
            > 
            > 









Reply via email to