are you being handed the /24? have it routed into the device by a smaller
or different subnet, but if the devices connected to ether1 have a /24 they
will never be able to communicate with the distributed space or vice versa


On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Tim Reichhart <
timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote:

>
> I was told to take that /24 and break it down to /29. But I didn't see an
> way to make work without readdressing whole subnet.
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard
> From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Date: 2015/08/26 18:59:54
>
> I did not, no.
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>  From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:58:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard
>
>
> Did you mean a /29 on eth1?
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373On Aug 26, 2015 12:53 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net>
> wrote:
>
> You can't have overlapping subnets.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>  From: "Tim Reichhart" <timreichh...@hometowncable.net>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:52:43 AM
> Subject: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard
>
> Hi guys
> I am having bit of an issue getting /29 to work in routerboard. What I am
> looking to do is put 172.16.2.x/29 on ether2 but I already have
> 172.16.2.1/24on ether1. So I don't know what I am missing here.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to