It sounds like the /24 is just conceptual for keeping track of these private IP blocks, don’t actually assign it to any interface. Assign /29 subnets to interfaces as needed.
From: Tim Reichhart Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard Mike basically rob haas was helping me out on this he sent me an little cheat sheet like this: a /29 – 255.255.255.248 is what I use on the backhauls Each Site is assign a site number – say 33 Every site is assigned a /24 for management with my IP scheme of 10.100.site.X The first backhauls would fall into 10.100.33.0/29 so: 10.100.33.1 – Local radio 10.100.33.2 – Local Router 10.100.33.3 – Remote Radio 10.100.33.4 – Remote Router The next backhaul would be out of 10.100.33.8/29 so: 10.100.33.9 – Local Radio 10.100.33.10 – Local Router 10.100.33.11 – Remote Radio 10.100.33.12 – Remote Router basically I want break down the ip's down for backhauls. Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 08/26/15 01:23 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard Can you tell us the bigger picture of what's going on so we can help better? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:09:01 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard I was told to take that /24 and break it down to /29. But I didn't see an way to make work without readdressing whole subnet. Tim -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 2015/08/26 18:59:54 I did not, no. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:58:27 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard Did you mean a /29 on eth1? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373On Aug 26, 2015 12:53 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: You can't have overlapping subnets. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:52:43 AM Subject: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard Hi guys I am having bit of an issue getting /29 to work in routerboard. What I am looking to do is put 172.16.2.x/29 on ether2 but I already have 172.16.2.1/24on ether1. So I don't know what I am missing here.
