I'm not entirely sure that would be worse... at least he's honest about what he is :P
But yes, no matter how bad anything is, it can always be worse. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: > Bernie Sanders J You are right. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett > *Sent:* Monday, October 12, 2015 9:18 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Guns etc > > > > It could always be worse. > > On 10/12/2015 12:16 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: > > He can’t be influenced by other peoples money. Not a bad thing. Again, > could he be worse than what we have? > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Monday, October 12, 2015 9:13 AM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Guns etc > > > > So... you're saying we should elect Trump? He does run a large > organization, afterall :P > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > > Everyone wants to elect a President based on ideology (or likeability), > ignoring that the primary job is to run the executive branch. Eisenhower > was probably the last POTUS who came to the job with credentials for > effectively running a giant organization. Not saying someone can’t grow to > fill the job, look at Reagan and JFK. But seriously, Ben Carson? > > > > I see the same mistake in the current contest to see what poor schmuck > gets to be Speaker of the House. They want to make it about ideology, and > yes it’s about getting the ideology of the majority caucus into > legislation, but the Speaker should be a get-stuff-done type, not an > ideologue. People still remember Sam Rayburn and Tip O’Neill. Hey, they > could bring Newt Gingrich or Denny Hastert out of retirement. Looks like > Hastert will avoid jail time, and he could probably use the money after > paying all that hush money. > > > > > > *From:* Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com> > > *Sent:* Monday, October 12, 2015 10:22 AM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Guns etc > > > > Your vision of Reagan is of a cartoon character, devoid of reality, > factually ignorant, and it vastly insults his memory. Were Reagan president > today, you'd be calling him a "libtard." You are clearly under 40 years old. > > > > Patrick Leary > > Telrad > > On Oct 11, 2015 5:47 PM, Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Nixon was conservative, but with him trying to cover up his crooked > tail, we never saw much of anything from him. He was truly ineffective. > Ford and Bush?? Hahaha. Not conservative RINO. Reagan, a different > story. He wasn't perfect, but in his heart he held conservatism high. > There is only one way to preside and that is to work with the other side > some. That's when he had to give up his far right position some Nixon is > the only conservative that had any bearing on this country in the last 50 > years. I should say conservative bearing! > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > Nixon Ford Reagan Bush... > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Yes, one. > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > You know we've had conservative politicians and presidents in the last 50 > years right? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Oct 11, 2015 3:52 PM, "Philip Rankin" <wireless...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since many of you are calling me rude, how about we just reverse that > logic??? How about all of the damage the liberal logic has done to this > country in the past say 50 years???? Is that not rude? You know, actually > it's so far beyond rude, that we can't measure it anymore. Start with the > debt, the credit ratings of the country, the backdoor payoff deals, the > stupidity of laws that cover laws that should not have ever been written in > the first place. Or, the stupid recent healthcare law that the majority of > the population don't want because we were lied to about it. And then the > RINOs bailing out their favorite companies after they got their kickbacks? > And this isn't even the tip of the iceberg. It's all liberal stupidity. > Notice I didn't say Democrat or Republican? It's libtards! These folk have > no concern for their country or their fellow man. All they want is to line > their pockets and control people! Call me rude if you like! I haven't > even cracked the door on the rudeness these people have done to all of us > including many generations to follow us! And, while were at it, how about > all of those babies that will never have an opportunity to join us? What a > sickening shame! No, Travesty! > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Haven't made my point yet Lewis. But, saw enough of those that were not > in agreement with you in the thread to know that they don't believe in > "Certain Inalienable Rights" with government here only to preserve those > rights, not impose someone else's stupidity on me. And, that the libs want > someone else to take care of them all of the time. To me, that's retarded > and just plain dumb. Now that I look at those that have their crazy > position and compare that position to their past posts on here, I now > understand some of their past posts here! > > > > I am not about to let someone shoot me during a convenience store holdup. > I will die with my 45 in hand before I let the bad guy take me or anyone > else easily. Now, to shoot someone as he is driving away with my dvd > player as more libtardiness suggested,,,, How dumb! To take a life because > someone is a thief??? That's just another liberal ploy adage to try to > make others believe that we shouldn't have those inalienable rights. Life > is precious, things, not so much! But my life is more precious to me than > to let someone else try to protect me from halfway across the county (The > Police)! > > > > So, to make my point about your comment "People assume you are out of > salient points to make." No, I'm just trying to use a concise word that > describes all the stupidity that today's liberals have stooped to. and > libtard pretty much does that! > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Come on now. Be civil. You only hurt your own argument when you resort to > name calling. People assume you are out of salient points to make. > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 1:09 PM Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Especially with all thee libtard views out there today! > > > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:10 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < > par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > > > > It is also a great reminder that people in other parts of the country do > not necessarily share your views. > > Also a great reminder that the founders of this country really did know > what they were doing. > > For things to happen in this country you have to AGREE...which is becoming > more and more difficult ;) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Sent:* Saturday, October 10, 2015 11:40 AM > > *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT Guns etc > > > > This has been fun reading. > > I love this list. Folks are smart and mostly polite and post some pretty > well reasoned arguments on both sides of almost any issue. This is all > the > social media I need. > > I did want to make a comment about the Illinois FOID card. > > I was a hostage in a bank robbery back in about 1993 in Quincy Illinois. > Once it was over and I got out of the bank, I learned that a co-worker > had > suffered some kind of stress attack and was in the hospital. That > afternoon > they were out of beds in some of the areas so that took him to the 5th > floor. That is the psych floor. > > Then, it turned out, anyone that gets admitted to a psych ward in Illinois > gets reported to the FOID people. > They revoke the FOID card. > > This guy was a big time hunter. It just about killed him. > He got some pretty good press and got some political help. Hot his card > back in about 6 weeks. > > So, if you want to keep your FOID stay out of psych wards! > > > > > > -- > > Philip J. Rankin > > Wireless Telecommunications Services > PO Box 24 > Pittsburg, KS 66762 > > > > > > -- > > Philip J. Rankin > > Wireless Telecommunications Services > PO Box 24 > Pittsburg, KS 66762 > > > > > > -- > > Philip J. Rankin > > Wireless Telecommunications Services > PO Box 24 > Pittsburg, KS 66762 > > > > > > -- > > Philip J. Rankin > > Wireless Telecommunications Services > PO Box 24 > Pittsburg, KS 66762 > > > > > > > > -- > > Philip J. Rankin > > Wireless Telecommunications Services > PO Box 24 > Pittsburg, KS 66762 > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer > viruses. > > ************************************************************************************ > > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer > viruses. > > ************************************************************************************ > > > > >
