I think everything that's certified under the new rules is pretty trustworthy. I've never seen anything from Cambium let me go above what I knew to be within the limits. I don't trust older UBNT firmware at all, but 5.6.2 and newer should keep everything compliant as long as the antennas are set right.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > Your responsibility is to expect what Ubnt offers and details to be true. > > Ubnt will almost certainly do a great job of covering their ass. No one > wants to test the tolerance of the FCC. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Oct 14, 2015 5:52 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> so how trustworthy is new hardware and the updated firmwares from UBNT >> and cambium to be compliant as long as I have the real antenna gain in? I >> don't ever foresee the fcc tooling around my network, but Ive worked hard >> to get compliant, and I'm treating everything as if it falls under the new >> rules. >> My chart may have been a vendors limits, its just what I was going by. I >> do know the 5.6.2 firmware from ubnt would alow me to go above what the >> chart said >> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes the rules are the same for all but with their current hardware >>> limitations the different products have to use different power levels to >>> still meet the OOBE requirements. >>> >>> >>> >>> -Ty >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Limiting factor is OOBE more than EIRP. >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> On Oct 14, 2015 2:13 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So the EIRP limits from the FCC differ per manufacturer? I thought >>>>> they were the same across the board >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Any generic chart isn't going to be particularly accurate now, since >>>>>> every radio is a bit different under the new rules - especially at the >>>>>> band >>>>>> edges. >>>>>> >>>>>> You pretty much just have to follow what the firmware lets you do. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I had a chart, I dont know where its at, it went away when I went to >>>>>>> windows 10. Just showed EIRP by channel/size accounting for band edges >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you’re talking equipment certified under the new FCC rules, >>>>>>>> there is no simple answer. It depends on the radio and may be >>>>>>>> different at >>>>>>>> every frequency even within the same band. So you need to check the >>>>>>>> firmware or a path calculator tool from the particular manufacturer, >>>>>>>> unless >>>>>>>> you are able to decipher the FCC equipment authorization filing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you’re talking equipment grandfathered under the old rules, I >>>>>>>> believe it’s still +36 dBm in 5725-5850 for APs, and +30 dBm in DFS >>>>>>>> bands >>>>>>>> (less if channel is smaller than 20 MHz). If you want to know >>>>>>>> 5150-5250, >>>>>>>> that wasn’t even available under the old rules. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I could be wrong, but that’s my understanding. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 14, 2015 2:54 PM >>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] current 5ghz chart >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> is there a current printable chart online I can see for printing as >>>>>>>> reference for EIRP rules >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >
