I assume you read my post? Have you ran torch on these customers to see
what the actual traffic is? I believe they all use an IPSEC VPN. Should
work through one layer of NAT (obviously does as you've seen), but I
don't know why not also through the SM DMZ which is really NAT, not PAT.
What's the term now, NAP-T or something like that is what we all call
"NAT" generally.
On 10/15/2015 3:14 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
BTW - this is with the SM on the 13.4 release (FSK in this particular
case).
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 10/15/2015 1:12 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
I think we have determined that the new AT&T "WiFi calling" feature
will not work with double NAT (even when the customer's router is on
the DMZ). This is the same behavior we've seen on T-mobile. It seems
to work if the customer router is in bridge mode, or the SM is in
bridge mode.
