If my memory serves me correctly, I believe Robert Pera has stated that wireless has peaked and they needed to look at other product lines. I’m not sure how that could be when WISPS barely cover 10%, if that, of the available Internet customers. As Ubiquiti opened up markets that Motorola ignored for years, I believe other new markets are going to be opening up very soon. I’m betting on it.
Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 6:02 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting antenna from UBNT Maybe they just aren't as bright as everyone is giving them credit. Except for Chuck of course. It seems to me they believe wireless is near dead so it isn't worth it. Solar being the future and all. Really I think it is a case of shiny object syndrome. UBNT always seems to have lacked some focus, or at least perseverance. Not to bash then to much. They defiant have a value product. I think they are hurting as the price of what I would term as better products have closed the price gap a good bit. On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 7:27 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote: That's what my guess would be too, but the airMax protocol was supposedly completely rewritten for the AC radios... you would think they would've designed it with sync in mind this time. If other companies can make sync work with atheros chipsets, I have to assume Ubiquiti could too... if they really wanted to. On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote: Many here seem to assume the problem is too difficult for Ubiquiti engineers to figure out. Maybe. But if I had to guess, my money would be on they boxed themselves in by developing the hardware and the airMax protocol first, and then couldn’t get GPS sync to work without starting over. From: Josh Luthman<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 6:04 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting antenna from UBNT Basically a sync capable hardware. Phy being physical. Layer 1. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:937-552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:937-552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 17, 2015 6:41 PM, "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <jeffl...@att.net<mailto:jeffl...@att.net>> wrote: I'm probably the only one that doesn't know this but what is a "proprietary 802.11 PHY layer"? Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519<tel:312-205-2519> Office 574-220-7826<tel:574-220-7826> Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com<mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com> On Oct 17, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote: proprietary 802.11 PHY layer
