The current Rocket can't do UNII-1, and it doesn't have a GPS... I think they also said the new one can do PTP and PTMP with the same hardware.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: > Ben, when is the RocketAC-Prism coming out and what is the difference with > the current RocketAC that already has the Prism system in it? > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ben Moore > *Sent:* Saturday, October 17, 2015 10:39 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Interesting antenna from UBNT > > > > Hi Lewis - > > > > I can assure you that this is most definitely not the case. Wireless is > most definitely not dead. Just in the past couple months we have > released/announced: > > > > LiteBeam AC > > RocketAC-Prism > > EdgePoint (for wireless deployments on towers) > > AF-3X > > AF-2X > > AF-2X and 3X antennas > > 300/400mm AC PowerBeam > > AirPrism Sector > > CRM Point - Network management > > > > Backwards compatibility is also being released to allow for transition, > along with a ton of other software features (airMagic, etc...). There are > also a lot of wireless products still in the works not yet announced. > > > > Anyway, we are working hard to continue to push things along. > > > > Regards, > > Ben > > > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Maybe they just aren't as bright as everyone is giving them credit. Except > for Chuck of course. It seems to me they believe wireless is near dead so > it isn't worth it. Solar being the future and all. Really I think it is a > case of shiny object syndrome. UBNT always seems to have lacked some focus, > or at least perseverance. Not to bash then to much. They defiant have a > value product. > > I think they are hurting as the price of what I would term as better > products have closed the price gap a good bit. > > > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 7:27 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That's what my guess would be too, but the airMax protocol was supposedly > completely rewritten for the AC radios... you would think they would've > designed it with sync in mind this time. > > If other companies can make sync work with atheros chipsets, I have to > assume Ubiquiti could too... if they really wanted to. > > > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > > Many here seem to assume the problem is too difficult for Ubiquiti > engineers to figure out. Maybe. But if I had to guess, my money would be > on they boxed themselves in by developing the hardware and the airMax > protocol first, and then couldn’t get GPS sync to work without starting > over. > > > > > > *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > > *Sent:* Saturday, October 17, 2015 6:04 PM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Interesting antenna from UBNT > > > > Basically a sync capable hardware. > > Phy being physical. Layer 1. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Oct 17, 2015 6:41 PM, "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <jeffl...@att.net> > wrote: > > I'm probably the only one that doesn't know this but what is a > "proprietary 802.11 PHY layer"? > > > > Jeff Broadwick > > ConVergence Technologies, Inc. > > 312-205-2519 Office > > 574-220-7826 Cell > > jbroadw...@converge-tech.com > > > On Oct 17, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > proprietary 802.11 PHY layer > > > > >
