Using this technique should avoid any FCC muddling, though the USDA might get involved
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcArnepkhv0 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 10:50 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Has FCC "gone off the rails" with latest Wi-Fi blockingfines? | ITworld Doing anything to interfere is jamming. Seems simple to me. From: Daniel White<mailto:afmu...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 6:15 AM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Has FCC "gone off the rails" with latest Wi-Fi blockingfines? | ITworld And I don’t think Commissioner Pai or O’Rielly disagree with you. They want clear FCC regulations on the matter. I agree with them. Jamming by definition is the increase of RF energy to overcome the lawful transmission of someone else… and even then… in Part 15… you have no recourse. I don’t think the FCC is exceeding its authority, but I do think the FCC needs to define the authority. Section 47 U.S.C. § 333 of the Telecommunications Act of 1933 is where the FCC gets its authority on the matter (according to the FCC website)… here is the text: No person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this chapter or operated by the United States Government. Interference in regards to radio communications has always been defined as RF energy. The code was written long before something like de-auth was possible. The FCC should make a clear definition of what jamming is… what is there to argue with there? Thank you, Daniel White afmu...@gmail.com<mailto:afmu...@gmail.com> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 Skype: danieldwhite Social: LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84>: Twitter<https://twitter.com/DanielWhite84> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 8:35 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Has FCC "gone off the rails" with latest Wi-Fi blocking fines? | ITworld +1 that's what they are supposed to do. -Ty On Nov 3, 2015 8:32 PM, "Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com<mailto:cpeter...@portnetworks.com>> wrote: IMHO, the FCC is doing exactly what they should be doing in these cases. The convention center APs would send spoofed deauth to anything they heard, including devices well outside the convention center. Deliberate malicious interference with another's use of shared spectrum. On Nov 3, 2015, at 8:13 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> wrote: http://www.itworld.com/article/3000979/mobile/has-fcc-gone-off-the-rails-with-latest-wi-fi-blocking-fines.html?google_editors_picks=true Jaime Solorza ________________________________ [Avast logo]<https://www.avast.com/antivirus> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
