Hmmmm....   List stripped the .zip file.   I'll try the .xml and see if
that goes though.


On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Missing the attachment I think, Steve.
>
> -Ty
>
>
>
> -Ty
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Steve Utick <sut...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Here is a Cacti Host Template that I built.   Works on AirFiber 5X and
>> AirFiber 24, and should work on any other AirFiber Platform, as it appears
>> they all use the same MIB.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I will try to remember to post a cacti host template here when I have
>>> one built for the AF5X, to save others the work of reinventing the wheel...
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am pulling and graphing most of the pertinent stuff and haven't had
>>>> any issues.  It is a huge step up from where they were.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> wow, scrolling through that, it is significantly more detailed than
>>>>> the last ubnt MIB I saw. They must've put quite a lot of person-hours into
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Works perfectly
>>>>>> http://dl.ubnt.com/firmwares/airfiber5X/v3.0.2.1/UBNT-MIB.txt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ubnt guys, what's the state of SNMP on these?  If any serious
>>>>>>> progress has been made in the last 3-4 months, can you paste a numeric
>>>>>>> snmpwalk of an operational unit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> second question: If SNMP is still broken, does CPU usage of the http
>>>>>>> management interface have any effect on traffic flow whatsoever?  I'm
>>>>>>> thinking of a short shell script with curl to login to the https front 
>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>> of the radio and grab key parameters like RSL on both chains. Every 60
>>>>>>> seconds.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to