You're talking about specialized mid-higher end hardware. That said, those drivers should be backported to that 2.6.32 kernel.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: > The gains are insignificant with an openvz jail environment compared to a > paravirtualized (PV, not HVM) Xen environment. With OpenVZ in its current > incarnation you are stuck running a 2.6.32 series ancient kernel which > significantly reduces support for high performance I/O devices such as the > latest 10GbE PCI-Express 3.0 NICs, which are now as cheap as $200 a piece. > Also nonexistant support for high performance 1500-2000MB/s storage devices > such as M.2 format PCI Express SSDs (Samsung, Intel) and support for the > motherboard firmwares that enable booting from M.2. > > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >> >> The can be significant performance gains in both memory reduction and >> IO by using OpenVZ though. It just depends on your needs and >> environment. >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Openvz is really more like a chroot jail. You can accomplish much better >> > functionality and the ability to run a wider range of guest VMs with xen >> > or >> > kvm. >> > >> > Keep in mind with openvz all guest OS must run the same kernel as the >> > host. >> > >> > Unless you need openvz for a hosting environment that will have hundreds >> > of >> > small VMs on a server with 128GB RAM? >> > >> > On Nov 11, 2015 3:58 PM, "Matt" <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Anyone out there using Proxmox for virtualization? Have been using if >> >> for few years running Centos Openvz containers. Like fact that Openvz >> >> is light weight and gives very little performance penalty. In Proxmox >> >> 4.x they have introduced the ZFS file system which I think is a great >> >> offering many features such as mirroring etc. They have also switched >> >> from Openvz to LXC for containers. Anyone used LXC much? Is it >> >> stable? Pros and cons vs Openvz? > >
