Moxa makes some pretty cool versions
On Nov 25, 2015 9:23 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

> I know you may scoff at the idea of a server based on a lowly ATOM chip.
> And the idea of paying around $545 for one, plus RAM and HDD.
>
> But I am putting a couple Supermicro 5018A-TN4 servers into service, and
> so far I'm pretty impressed with them.  I just pop in an 8 GB stick of DRAM
> and a 256GB 850 Pro SSD and then load CentOS 7.  I think these could even
> be used for virtualization, if you don't need hot plug HDD or hardware
> RAID, like maybe you have a SAN.
>
> These are in a short depth 1U chassis that easily mounts to a 2 post rack,
> no need for a rail kit.  The CPU has a passive heatsink, there is a chassis
> fan but I suspect everything would be fine if the fan died, the power
> consumption seems negligible under normal load.  It's as if it generates
> zero heat.  So with an SSD, there is little to fail, it's probably down to
> the power supply.  Despite the compact size, nothing inside is crowded.
> The chassis seems to be a dedicated design for this server, not one of
> their multipurpose chassis.  My only complaint is there's almost no room on
> the front for any labels, unless you cover up the logo and serial number.
>
> Some highlights:
>
> 2.4 GHz 8 core ATOM C2750 SOC (8 physical cores)
> up to 32 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 ECC SO-DIMM (yes, ECC memory)
> 2 x 3.5" or 4 x 2.5" HDD bays
> 4 x GbE interfaces plus IPMI
> 1 PCI-E slot
>
> Doesn't make much sense as a desktop, definitely a server.
>
> I wondered about the 8 physical cores without hyperthreading support, I
> kept thinking that was equivalent to a 4 core CPU with HT.  But I did a
> little reading, and realized you don't just count virtual cores to estimate
> performance, especially if the tasks are computation intensive not memory
> intensive.
>
> There is also a 5018A0TN7B model for network security appliance use, based
> on the C2758 SOC which includes encryption support.  7xGbE with software
> controlled bypass, and up to 64 GB of UDIMM.  That's a lot of memory.
>
>

Reply via email to