I have some PIII Xeon G2’s complete with SCSI drives.  They are amazing pieces 
of mechanical construction.  They weigh a ton.  Unfortunately I doubt I could 
get someone to come and get them for free, except for the metal content.  I 
just hate taking them to the recycler.  I have a pile of Cisco routers headed 
for the same place.


From: Lewis Bergman 
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 11:31 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - 8 core ATOM server

I sold for DL380'S FOR $150 each. But they came and got them.




On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, 10:50 AM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:

  What are you doing with VMs? We bought a few DL380s for between $1200
  and $1500, and we run several virtual machines on each one. Cost per
  virtual machine is less than $300, and we can make a new one in a few
  minutes.

  bp
  <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

  On 11/25/2015 8:23 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
  > I know you may scoff at the idea of a server based on a lowly ATOM
  > chip. And the idea of paying around $545 for one, plus RAM and HDD.
  >
  > But I am putting a couple Supermicro 5018A-TN4 servers into service,
  > and so far I'm pretty impressed with them.  I just pop in an 8 GB
  > stick of DRAM and a 256GB 850 Pro SSD and then load CentOS 7.  I think
  > these could even be used for virtualization, if you don't need hot
  > plug HDD or hardware RAID, like maybe you have a SAN.
  >
  > These are in a short depth 1U chassis that easily mounts to a 2 post
  > rack, no need for a rail kit.  The CPU has a passive heatsink, there
  > is a chassis fan but I suspect everything would be fine if the fan
  > died, the power consumption seems negligible under normal load.  It's
  > as if it generates zero heat.  So with an SSD, there is little to
  > fail, it's probably down to the power supply. Despite the compact
  > size, nothing inside is crowded.  The chassis seems to be a dedicated
  > design for this server, not one of their multipurpose chassis.  My
  > only complaint is there's almost no room on the front for any labels,
  > unless you cover up the logo and serial number.
  >
  > Some highlights:
  >
  > 2.4 GHz 8 core ATOM C2750 SOC (8 physical cores)
  > up to 32 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 ECC SO-DIMM (yes, ECC memory)
  > 2 x 3.5" or 4 x 2.5" HDD bays
  > 4 x GbE interfaces plus IPMI
  > 1 PCI-E slot
  >
  > Doesn't make much sense as a desktop, definitely a server.
  >
  > I wondered about the 8 physical cores without hyperthreading support,
  > I kept thinking that was equivalent to a 4 core CPU with HT.  But I
  > did a little reading, and realized you don't just count virtual cores
  > to estimate performance, especially if the tasks are computation
  > intensive not memory intensive.
  >
  > There is also a 5018A0TN7B model for network security appliance use,
  > based on the C2758 SOC which includes encryption support. 7xGbE with
  > software controlled bypass, and up to 64 GB of UDIMM. That's a lot of
  > memory.
  >

Reply via email to