"right away" sounds ominous
-----Original Message-----
From: Sriram Chaturvedi
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out right
away.
Thanks,
Sriram
________________________________________
From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh
<m...@amplex.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:24 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i
instead of 450 for 430 upgrade projects. Do I have to get all of the 430 SM�s
swapped first?
Mark
On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider
<aaron.schnei...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
It should work, but at the moment I can�t recall if/when we tried this
with PTP mode. I�ll let you know.
450i - 450 isn�t really an �interop� situation like 430 - 450 was. 430 -
450 was quite a bit different, needing SISO to talk to MIMO with the way
we did MIMO at first (MIMO-B using both channels for data). 450i - 450 is
much more similar, and we have been using that combination internally for
a long time. It wasn�t part of the initial release of 450i due to needing
to focus on the HW release itself.
I�ll be in touch on the PTP question. It is important to allow you to
upgrade a PTP link one end at a time.
Regards,
-Aaron
On 11/27/15, 12:09 AM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup"
<af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
I thought interop was only for PMP?
On 11/26/2015 11:38 PM, Matt wrote:
Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now?
