Hi Steve,

We have been prioritizing radio performance over the GUI for a very long time. 
But, like Josh indicated, we made some incremental improvements in GUI 
performance in 2.4 and 2.5 releases but we are fully aware its not enough. The 
team has been working on a wholesale rework of the GUI engine (not as much as 
the look and feel) and we hope to have significant GUI performance gains in a 
Q1 release. We want to make sure it works on a PC, netbook, mobile etc. with 
all kinds of processor and memory configurations. We have been receiving 
tremendous feedback on use cases and performance pains seen my many folks on 
here and we’re taking all this input and working through them carefully. So 
keep the feedback (as negative as they can be) coming, on the GUI performance.

All I can ask at this time is your patience and support.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com>




On Dec 4, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:

It does seem slightly better in 2.5.1 than what it did in 2.3, but there is a 
good bit of room for speed improvements.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:22 PM, George Skorup 
<geo...@cbcast.com<mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
I can deal with the GUI being stupid and slow because the performance is better 
than UBNT

On 12/4/2015 12:11 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
the biggest complaint i have is that rather than just loading the components on 
the page you are on, it loads the entire webserver and only displays the 
components of that page, very inefficient

Im lazy too, I like a site survey option, it makes life easier for techs to not 
have to know every possible essid

fsk and 450 make me happy



On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Josh Baird 
<joshba...@gmail.com<mailto:joshba...@gmail.com>> wrote:
What are your problems?

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Adam Moffett 
<<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>dmmoff...@gmail.com<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:
I wish a GUI glitch was the worst of my problems.

On 12/4/2015 12:57 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
The more We are using EPMP the more i wish the radios had a face so i could 
punch it in the face

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:35 PM, George Skorup 
<geo...@cbcast.com<mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
Yes. You cannot have single quotes in the device name. I tried that once and 
the radio acted really stupid. None of the config would display. For example, I 
changed it from "Bob's House" to "Bobs House" and it was sane again.

Almost the same thing on Canopy, just a little bit smarter about it. It won't 
even let you put a ' in the SNMP site name field. It just reverts back to the 
No Site Name default.

On 12/3/2015 7:29 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I think it was related to a single quote ' in some of the fields of the config. 
I dumped the config, edited them out and now it seems to be fine.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
<http://www.ics-il.com/>http://www.ics-il.com<http://www.ics-il.com/>

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

Midwest Internet Exchange
<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>http://www.midwest-ix.com<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
________________________________
From: "Josh Luthman" <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com><mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
To: <mailto:af@afmug.com> af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 6:44:54 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

Never had a problem, but keep in mind I use one PC to update from shipped 
firmware to latest and then slap on a template.

Then I use the laptop in the truck to do everything else on site.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340<tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Mathew Howard 
<<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>mhoward...@gmail.com<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>>
 wrote:
I saw something like that happen, but it went back to normal after I reloaded 
the interface... or maybe I had to reboot it, I don't remember for sure.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Mike Hammett 
<<mailto:af...@ics-il.net>af...@ics-il.net<mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
Have any of you seen where most of a Force 110's setting fields are blank when 
you login and when you go to save it after entering everything, it wants to 
reboot to the 192.168.0.2 address? That's clearly not what I have entered, but 
that's what it wants to use.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
<http://www.ics-il.com/>http://www.ics-il.com<http://www.ics-il.com/>

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

Midwest Internet Exchange
<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>http://www.midwest-ix.com<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>







--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.





--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.



Reply via email to