Don’t forget a more rigid tray. We are using 12 bricks in the tray. It makes it heavy enough that we can lean a ladder against it, even at 20’.
Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 9:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Non penetrating mounts My main differentiator I think will be a clamping method allowing you to use whatever diameter mast (user supplied) you want. 1-4.5 inches. And the tilt function. Working on ideas to allow modular increases in the footprint. From: Eric Kuhnke<mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 7:38 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Non penetrating mounts My two cents: It will be capital intensive, but build a product line of robust larger sized (3'x4', 5'x5' and larger) non penetrating roof mounts to compete with Baird, Rohn and Commscope (Andrew). There is very little competition in the North American marketplace for carrier-grade NPRMs aside from those three companies. Go after the carrier/cellco market. I'm talking about the NPRMs that are used with tubular antenna shroud radomes (or faux brick chimney radomes) to put LTE sectors on rooftops in urban areas. On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote: I get constantly asked to do a non penetrating mount. I have always resisted because there are a ton of them out there already. But I get almost daily searches for this term on my website. It appears folks presume I have one. If I did one, I would like to have some feature or quality that differentiates it from the rest. Perhaps a unit that can be locked or hinged for flat or peak mounts. Maybe one with hinged legs that give it a wider footprint using greater leverage so you don’t need as many concrete blocks. I dunno, any ideas?
