+1 for policy based routing. It takes some scripts to utilize it in a redundant scenario.
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net --- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman > On Jan 14, 2016, at 9:51 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm > <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Im having a hard time grasping ospf filters > > Is there a way to announce the /29 out ether1 at a lower cost the i announce > on ether2 and announce the /30 out ether2 at a lower cost than ether1? That > way the rest of the network uses the preferred interface to route each in > except in the case of failover? I could just use source based routes with > differing metrics within the router for the default routes of the two? > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com > <mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>> wrote: > Ehhh correction. I think you could do what you wanted with VRF, but you > actually could likely get by with policy based routing (PBR) so the routing > table was aware of both interfaces. As ugly as PBR is in most cases, it might > be a bit cleaner here. > > On Jan 14, 2016 11:00 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com > <mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>> wrote: > Look into VRF. > > On Jan 14, 2016 10:52 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote: > We have a customer who has two connections to us > Their firewall eth0 connects to ether4 with a /29 and their eth1 connects to > ether5 > They have a 3rd party 10mb fiber circuit on ether1 that terminates in our NOC > for the /29 traffic and the ether2 connects to our wireless network for their > /30 > > the /30 is for their internet traffic, the /29 is for their VOIP and VPN > > I have OSPF enabled on the fiber, so both subnets are routing through the > fiber right now, Im trying to avoid any static routes on anything other than > the CPE mikrotik to get traffic flowing the right direction, allowing the > fiber to fail over to the wireless both in failure and as a last resort for > spillover above the 10mb > > Is this clear as mud? Currently we only have static and OSPF capability on > our network > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
