post your bgp config pls. Also, why are they using next hop self = yes.
and based on what you posted on the MT Forum (it is not the config, more of a status ..) would indicate that Their side is complaining about your ASN. :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Sterling Jacobson" <sterl...@avative.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 3:53:00 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP 32 Bit RouterOS AS Accept? > This is what I see. > I posted their config in this mikrotik post here: > http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=103924 > I appreciate your help. > It’s got to be something simple on their end or my end. > I have nearly the same config set up on another 1072 to another peer and it > enteres the accept state with the same ASN. > So I’m still leaning towards it being their Brocade. > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds > Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 11:16 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP 32 Bit RouterOS AS Accept? > Enable BGP logging in Mikrotik, this should give you better detail. Make sure > the info you get back in the log is correct (that they have your AS set > right), > and double check your config. > On Jan 16, 2016 7:19 PM, "Sterling Jacobson" < sterl...@avative.net > wrote: >> I'm running one of those new fancy routerboard CCR 1072 routers on RouterOS >> 6.33.1. >> If I use my 32 bit BGP AS number the remote says Bad Remote AS. >> If I fake one around 65010 then it establishes a connection. >> Is this my problem or theirs? >> They are using Brocade MLXe code 5.8. >> Anyone else established a succesfull BGP with 32 bit AS number on routeros? >> Just want to try and narrow this down before I blame their Brocade for being >> complete junk, hahaha!
