Are all timing port sources equivalent, or is that another mess?
From: Forrest Christian (List Account)
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 7:17 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450 Watchdog resets - was: To Cambium With Love-
Replace the bad ePMP units.
Sync over timing port is a whole 'nother discussion.
Especially since it's on a completely different alignment, although I do know
cambium is working on that.
-forrest
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
I don't see Cambium's UGPS mentioned in any of these discussions. Is this
because no one uses them? Is price the reason?
-----Original Message----- From: George Skorup
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 3:39 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450 Watchdog resets - was: To Cambium With Love-
Replace the bad ePMP units.
Forrest, have you ran these same tests on your regular 10/100 PMP/PTP100
SyncInjector? I'd guess it's no different than a CMM3. With the regular
450APs, I see no reason to go GigE since they can't do >125Mbps aggregate.
And I really hope Cambium is listening to you. A software solution to
compensate for this long cable issue is obviously easier for everyone.
On 1/22/2016 9:48 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
--
Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
